From: davej@redhat.com (Dave Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Status of arch/arm in linux-next
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:15:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110429201521.GC12256@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110426181508.GB1908@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:15:08PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Indeed. So in my opinion it makes sense to move code into the drivers
> > directory, at least the code that's going to be used by multiple platforms
> > (that need not be a complete driver).
>
> Ok, so my opinion on this has changed a little over the weekend.
> I don't totally hate it now, but I'm still not a huge fan.
> That said, I won't stand in the way if this is what everyone agrees is
> the way forward.
>
> in cpufreq.next I moved the x86 drivers over. Someone look it over ?
> If that looks like what you all had in mind, start sending me the patches
> for other arches, and I'll get them queued up for .40
FYI, this is now on the 'move-drivers' branch in cpufreq.git
Unless there's a good reason not to, I'm going to start pushing this to Linus
next merge window.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-14 9:44 Status of arch/arm in linux-next Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 11:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-14 12:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 12:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-14 14:20 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-14 14:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-14 14:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 18:32 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-15 15:12 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-15 15:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-15 16:10 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-16 8:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-16 16:57 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18 8:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-18 13:57 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18 14:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-18 15:58 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18 17:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-18 20:23 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18 21:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-18 23:55 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-14 14:07 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-15 2:59 ` Nico Erfurth
2011-04-15 8:21 ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-04-15 13:13 ` Nico Erfurth
2011-04-15 1:16 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-15 6:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-19 14:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-19 14:50 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-19 14:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-19 15:04 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-19 15:14 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-19 16:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-19 16:05 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-21 20:14 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-21 21:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-22 7:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-26 14:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-26 17:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-26 18:15 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-29 20:15 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2011-04-30 0:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-01 23:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-19 16:27 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-19 17:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-20 6:36 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-21 7:32 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-21 8:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-22 7:56 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-22 11:46 ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-02 13:49 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-05-02 19:21 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 7:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-20 7:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-15 14:30 ` Martin Guy
2011-04-15 15:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-18 15:17 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-04-18 16:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-18 21:54 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-04-19 15:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-19 15:20 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110429201521.GC12256@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).