From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: davej@redhat.com (Dave Jones) Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:15:22 -0400 Subject: Status of arch/arm in linux-next In-Reply-To: <20110426181508.GB1908@redhat.com> References: <20110414094447.GA1611@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201104261605.26791.arnd@arndb.de> <201104261904.45923.rjw@sisk.pl> <20110426181508.GB1908@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110429201521.GC12256@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:15:08PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > Indeed. So in my opinion it makes sense to move code into the drivers > > directory, at least the code that's going to be used by multiple platforms > > (that need not be a complete driver). > > Ok, so my opinion on this has changed a little over the weekend. > I don't totally hate it now, but I'm still not a huge fan. > That said, I won't stand in the way if this is what everyone agrees is > the way forward. > > in cpufreq.next I moved the x86 drivers over. Someone look it over ? > If that looks like what you all had in mind, start sending me the patches > for other arches, and I'll get them queued up for .40 FYI, this is now on the 'move-drivers' branch in cpufreq.git Unless there's a good reason not to, I'm going to start pushing this to Linus next merge window. Dave