From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 08:15:42 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v5 4/8] arm/dt: probe for platforms via the device tree In-Reply-To: <20110429071548.12522.56929.stgit@ponder> References: <20110429070135.12522.35745.stgit@ponder> <20110429071548.12522.56929.stgit@ponder> Message-ID: <20110502151542.GG2092@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Grant Likely [110429 00:13]: > + > +/** > + * setup_machine_fdt - Machine setup when an dtb was passed to the kernel > + * @dt_phys: physical address of dt blob > + * > + * If a dtb was passed to the kernel in r2, then use it to choose the > + * correct machine_desc and to setup the system. > + */ > +struct machine_desc * __init setup_machine_fdt(unsigned int dt_phys) > +{ ... > + > + /* Retrieve various information from the /chosen node */ > + of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_chosen, boot_command_line); Just to make sure we're considering properly what this change means.. Does this patch require using CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE for older bootloaders with the device tree append patch? Or should we still somehow get ATAG_CMDLINE let's say in the uncompress code and use that if nothing else is found? Otherwise booting old boards with the same kernel will be painful as it requires a kernel recompile to set the cmdline.. Also, not counting the separate DT append issues, I got things booting with these patches (and the dts files) on omaps. So for patches 1 - 5, and patch 8: Tested-by: Tony Lindgren I don't have versatile or tegra, so can't test those :)