From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 11:16:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH][WAS:bcmai,axi] bcma: add Broadcom specific AMBA bus driver
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=6BFD4OmtU1WPxjbFJQe36=mZKEA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1304632783-8781-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
	<201105061605.31625.arnd@arndb.de>
	<BANLkTikjr0ZTNOu69F+iKhwufE9KKMg4Tg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTimGBNT4FkS4mO9ToLWft0bCEYcEgg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1304790665.13983.10.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua>
	<BANLkTikLFff_86Fvg+jSty9vGLENiELF2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<1304792795.13983.28.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua>
	<BANLkTi=6BFD4OmtU1WPxjbFJQe36=mZKEA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110508101609.GF27807@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 08:48:10PM +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> Really, what's wrong with that? Does it kill anyone's pet we print
> this? We also do:
> pr_err("Scanning failed because of wrong CID\n");
> return -1;
> While we could drop pr_err. Why to do this? Advanced used can always
> check what -1 means.

And why return -1 when we have a system of error codes?  I _really_ wish
people would stop returning -1 for "some random error occurred".