From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 12:06:43 -0700 Subject: [PATCH V2] genalloc: add support to specify the physical address In-Reply-To: <20110512173832.GA8633@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1303282455-26649-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <20110428081535.GI17290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110512173832.GA8633@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20110512120643.67e7929d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 12 May 2011 18:38:32 +0100 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:15:35AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:54:15AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > so we specify the virtual address as base of the pool chunk and then > > > get the physical address for hardware IP > > > > > > as example on at91 we will use on spi, uart or macb > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > > > Cc: Nicolas Ferre > > > Cc: Patrice VILCHEZ > > > Cc: Andrew Morton > > > --- > > > Hi Andrew, > > > I integrate the documentation fix > > > could replace the previous one with this one > > > > > > V2: > > > update documentation > > > use phys_addr_t for physical addr > > > Best Regards, > > > > I notice no comments on this - maybe it needs to be Cc'd to linux-mm too? > > > > Andrew - do you have any views on this? > > Still haven't heard anything. What's the status? Sorry, I missed the earlier email. I've had v2 queued for 2.6.39 for a month. If someone merges it into some other tree then that's OK by me - I'll just drop my copy when it turns up in -next.