From: mgorman@suse.de (Mel Gorman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: sparsemem: allow pfn_valid to be overridden when using SPARSEMEM
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:59:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110518165910.GS5279@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305734639-6561-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:03:59PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> In commit eb33575c ("[ARM] Double check memmap is actually valid with a
> memmap has unexpected holes V2"), a new function, memmap_valid_within,
> was introduced to mmzone.h so that holes in the memmap which pass
> pfn_valid in SPARSEMEM configurations can be detected and avoided.
>
> The fix to this problem checks that the pfn <-> page linkages are
> correct by calculating the page for the pfn and then checking that
> page_to_pfn on that page returns the original pfn. Unfortunately, in
> SPARSEMEM configurations, this results in reading from the page flags to
> determine the correct section. Since the memmap here has been freed,
> junk is read from memory and the check is no longer robust.
>
> In the best case, reading from /proc/pagetypeinfo will give you the
> wrong answer. In the worst case, you get SEGVs, Kernel OOPses and hung
> CPUs.
>
> This patch allows architectures to provide their own pfn_valid function
> instead of using the default implementation used by sparsemem. The
> architecture-specific version is aware of the memmap state and will
> return false when passed a pfn for a freed page within a valid section.
>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
I don't have an ARM machine to test on and I'm not particularly
sensitive to the requirements of ARM so I'm not the best reviewer. If
this passes tests, I see little problem with it other than the
architecture-specific pfn_valid is slower than the sparsemem equivalent
and the cache footprint is probably higher as memblock_is_memory
is searching a list of blocks. If this problem is exclusive to
reading /proc/pagetypeinfo, you might want to consider only using
memblock_is_memory in that case. Otherwise, functionally it looks like
it should work.
> ---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 3 +++
> arch/arm/include/asm/page.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mm/init.c | 4 +++-
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 377a7a5..d6cfc9c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -1520,6 +1520,9 @@ config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_DEFAULT
> config ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
> def_bool ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
>
> +config ARCH_PROVIDES_PFN_VALID
> + def_bool ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL || !SPARSEMEM
> +
> config HIGHMEM
> bool "High Memory Support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> depends on MMU && EXPERIMENTAL
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h
> index f51a695..8702233 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h
> @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ typedef unsigned long pgprot_t;
>
> typedef struct page *pgtable_t;
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_PROVIDES_PFN_VALID
> extern int pfn_valid(unsigned long);
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> index e591513..d425b36 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> @@ -252,13 +252,15 @@ static void __init arm_bootmem_free(unsigned long min, unsigned long max_low,
> free_area_init_node(0, zone_size, min, zhole_size);
> }
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_PROVIDES_PFN_VALID
> int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> {
> return memblock_is_memory(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pfn_valid);
> +#endif
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
> static void arm_memory_present(void)
> {
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index e56f835..72225dd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1053,12 +1053,14 @@ static inline struct mem_section *__pfn_to_section(unsigned long pfn)
> return __nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn));
> }
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_PROVIDES_PFN_VALID
> static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> {
> if (pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS)
> return 0;
> return valid_section(__nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)));
> }
> +#endif
>
> static inline int pfn_present(unsigned long pfn)
> {
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-18 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-18 16:03 [PATCH] ARM: sparsemem: allow pfn_valid to be overridden when using SPARSEMEM Will Deacon
2011-05-18 16:59 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2011-05-19 8:55 ` Will Deacon
2011-05-19 9:23 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-19 12:16 ` Will Deacon
2011-05-18 18:53 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-05-19 9:05 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110518165910.GS5279@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox