From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/7] Consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 19:05:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110519170548.GA1075@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110519160901.GC26816@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
Hi Shawn,
> Should I go for v3 right now to address the patch applying problems
> and that ESDHC_IMX build issue, or hold for a while to see if you
> have more comments on v2?
Please wait a little bit more.
> And what is your position on patch #5 which merges esdhc imx and mpc
> support into one? As Anton has voted a NO there, I would probably
> drop the patch if there is another person has strong opinion to get
> imx and mpc stay separated.
This was the other main issue I spotted so far. I wanted to have another look
tomorrow, yet the tendency is that I agree with Anton.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20110519/06e7724f/attachment-0001.sig>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-19 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-05 13:22 [PATCH v2 0/7] Consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-pltfm device drivers " Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:24 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mmc: sdhci: eliminate sdhci_of_host and sdhci_of_data Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:23 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-24 19:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-of device drivers self registered Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:23 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-06 2:15 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-24 19:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] sdhci: rename sdhci-esdhc-imx.c to sdhci-esdhc.c Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mmc: sdhci: consolidate sdhci-of-esdhc and sdhci-esdhc-imx Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:20 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-19 9:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-24 19:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-25 6:06 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-25 6:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-05-25 9:36 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mmc: sdhci: merge two sdhci-pltfm.h into one Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:13 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ARM: mxc: remove esdhc.h and use the public one Shawn Guo
2011-05-06 8:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-05-09 6:23 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-19 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered Wolfram Sang
2011-05-19 16:09 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-19 17:05 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110519170548.GA1075@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).