From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:50:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 5/8] ARM i.MX Allow to compile together i.MX1/21/25/27 In-Reply-To: References: <1305823648-2428-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1305823648-2428-6-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20110519180456.GA21172@pengutronix.de> <20110519190352.GS30963@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20110519195027.GU30963@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 03:44:13PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2011, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 08:04:56PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 06:47:25PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > index a5353fc..0202ca0 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/Kconfig > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/Kconfig > > > > @@ -14,20 +14,12 @@ choice > > > > prompt "Freescale CPU family:" > > > > default ARCH_MX3 > > > > > > > > -config ARCH_MX1 > > > > - bool "MX1-based" > > > > +config ARCH_IMX_V4_V5 > > > > + select ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT > > > > + select AUTO_ZRELADDR > > > select EXPERIMENTAL > > > > Hm, yes. Though I would really prefer removing the depency on > > EXPERIMENTAL. > > If those features are actually used, relied upon, and therefore > obviously tested, I think the experimental dependency doesn't make sense > anymore. I'll add a patch for this to this series. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |