From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 06:56:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] cleanup regulator supply definitions in mach-omap2 to
	use REGULATOR_SUPPLY
In-Reply-To: <13FCB0DC-28DB-4AC5-A08A-D8A71AA8D031@linuxhacker.ru>
References: <1306101529-22013-1-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru>
	<20110522224510.GA15858@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<13FCB0DC-28DB-4AC5-A08A-D8A71AA8D031@linuxhacker.ru>
Message-ID: <20110522225636.GC15882@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 06:49:26PM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:

> If I end-up with a new version of the patch, what do you think would be best as a divisor
> between the patches? Just have ~half of changes split into another patch or do you have any other ideas?

Split the changes to not set .dev out from the changes to use
REGULATOR_SUPPLY().  It's much easier to read big block changes like
this when you get a big set of exactly the same change rather than a mix
of different changes.