From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mfd wm8350: allocate irq descs dynamically
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:46:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110524094658.GA4005@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110524072814.GC22096@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:28:14AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:41:00AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> > on systems that do actually have the IRQ range allocated for some other
> > reason.
> By 'some other reason' you mean an implementation bug? If the range is
> already allocated the wm8350 driver should better not use it.
Well, one obvious example is if someone's using the device with a sparse
system already - they'll have had to arrange to allocate the IRQ range
already.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-20 7:59 i.MX: switch to sparse irqs Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 7:59 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM i.MX tzic: do not depend on MXC_INTERNAL_IRQS Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 7:59 ` [PATCH] mfd wm8350: allocate irq descs dynamically Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 12:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-20 13:07 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 13:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-21 11:29 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-23 6:25 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-23 10:44 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-23 14:41 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-23 15:22 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-23 16:46 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-23 22:41 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-24 7:28 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-24 9:46 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-05-24 11:52 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-24 15:35 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-25 8:13 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-25 9:23 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-25 19:10 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 7:59 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM i.MX avic: do not depend on MXC_INTERNAL_IRQS Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 7:59 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM i.MX: get rid of wrong MXC_INTERNAL_IRQ usage Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 7:59 ` [PATCH 4/9] mfd wm8350: allocate irq descs dynamically Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 7:59 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM i.MX mx31ads: allocate irqs for expio dynamically Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 7:59 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM i.MX 3ds debugboard: allocate irqs dynamically Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 7:59 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM i.MX: use sparse irqs Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 7:59 ` [PATCH 8/9] dma IPU: rework irq handling Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 13:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-20 13:30 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 16:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-20 22:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-20 7:59 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM i.MX3: remove now useless ipu platform data from boards Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110524094658.GA4005@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).