From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 14:23:47 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Xilinx: Adding zynq platform support In-Reply-To: References: <201105261559.41993.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <20110530202347.GC32035@ponder.secretlab.ca> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 05:47:35PM +0800, Barry Song wrote: > 2011/5/26 Arnd Bergmann : > > On Wednesday 25 May 2011, Grant Likely wrote: > >> > >> As per discussion attached below. ?Please pull this tree adding device > >> tree support to ARM, plus some other minor device tree changes. > > > > Hi Grant and Linus, > > > > There is also the new Xilinx zynq subarchitecture pending that depends > > on this, see below. Should we also include that right away, in order > > to have an example for other platforms? I think the code is clean > > enough and it would be good to have. > > > > ? ? ? ?Arnd > > > > 8<--------- > > From: Grant Likely > > > > The 1st board support is minimal to get a system up and running > > on the Xilinx platform. > > > > This platform reuses the clock implementation from plat-versatile, and > > it depends entirely on CONFIG_OF support. ?There is only one board > > support file which obtains all device information from a device tree > > dtb file which is passed to the kernel at boot time. > > > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely > > [john.linn at xilinx.com: Reverted dependency on of_irq_domain patches] > > Signed-off-by: John Linn > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > > is there a whole complete tree for zynq? i'd like to refer. thanks! as > i am moving csr prima2 to device tree, we need to change so many > codes. i hope we can follow what the way zynq is doing. It is in linux-next. Hopefully we'll get it merged into the arm subarch maintainer tree early in this cycle. You can also look at arch/powerpc/platforms/* to see examples of how to work with the DT. I'm also working on some howto documentation for doing DT work. g.