From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/8 v2] ARM i.MX Allow to compile together i.MX1/21/25/27
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:47:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110601164731.GI23771@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201106011724.26704.arnd@arndb.de>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 05:24:26PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 June 2011, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >
> > This allows for all armv4 and armv5 based i.MX systems to be compiled
> > together in one kernel. To accomplish this we need ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT
> > and AUTO_ZRELADDR which is selected in Kconfig.
> > As compiling with ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT breaks XIP support and different
> > PHYS_OFFSETs break uImage support the old way to integrate only one
> > of these SoCs is kept in place.
>
> Great stuff!
>
> My main concern is that it's really confusing to have so many symbols
> with slightly different scopes:
>
> * SOC_SELECT_IMX1 HAVE_SOC_IMX1 ARCH_MX1 SOC_IMX1
> * SOC_SELECT_IMX21 HAVE_SOC_IMX21 ARCH_MX2 SOC_IMX21
The ARCH_MX* macros should be removed, but some driver Kconfig entries
still depend on them.
>
> Are you sure that this is actually the minimum set that is required?
I'd love to remove some of these, but I think they are required.
SOC_SELECT_IMX1 and HAVE_SOC_IMX1 are only used to offer the right
Kconfig magic.
>
> I assume that you have gone through all the uses of these symbols
> to check that there is no silent breakage if you enable more than
> one. The only ones that looks suspicious to me are
> arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/timex.h
See An earlier patch in this series. The ifdefs are removed and
CLOCK_TICK_RATE is replaced with a bogus value. CLOCK_TICK_RATE
is unused but still required to compile the kernel.
> and
> arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/debug-macro.S.
This can be used only when only one family is compiled in. Doing
otherwise should be catched with an error during comppilation.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-01 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-19 16:47 i.MX consolidation patches Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 1/8] ARM i.MX: fix last user of iomux.h and remove it Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/8] ARM i.MX: define CLOCK_TICK_RATE to bogus value Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 3/8] ARM i.MX: remove SoC defines around header includes Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 4/8] ARM i.MX: dmav1: kill SoC ifdefs Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 5/8] ARM i.MX Allow to compile together i.MX1/21/25/27 Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 18:04 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-05-19 19:03 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 19:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-19 19:50 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-01 13:22 ` [PATCH 5/8 v2] " Sascha Hauer
2011-06-01 13:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-01 15:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-01 16:47 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2011-06-01 17:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 6/8] ARM i.MX mxc.h: use CONFIG_SOC_* instead of CONFIG_ARCH_* Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM i.MX debug macro: " Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:54 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-05-19 19:07 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: mxc: update defconfigs Sascha Hauer
2011-05-30 7:57 ` i.MX consolidation patches Shawn Guo
2011-06-01 12:35 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-01 13:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-01 14:18 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-01 14:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-01 14:36 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-01 14:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-06-22 7:56 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-22 8:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 8:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-22 9:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 14:58 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-22 15:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-22 15:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-22 15:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 16:35 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-01 21:08 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-06-01 23:04 ` Matt Sealey
2011-06-02 10:34 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-02 11:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-02 15:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-06-02 23:59 ` Matt Sealey
2011-06-03 12:02 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-03 12:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-06-03 14:18 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110601164731.GI23771@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).