From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 00:18:37 +0200 Subject: [linux-pm] [RFC PATCH v3] ARM hibernation/suspend-to-disk support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20110602221837.GB14328@ucw.cz> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi! > Please let me know what you think, > Thanks in advance, > +void save_processor_state(void) > +{ > + flush_thread(); > + local_fiq_disable(); > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_MACH_HIBERNATION_HOOK > + mach_save_state(); > +#endif > +} Could we always define mach_save_state, and get rid of ifdef? -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html