From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org (Matthew Garrett)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:12:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] mm: Linux VM Infrastructure to support Memory
	Power Management
In-Reply-To: <20110610193713.GJ2230@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20110610155954.GA25774@srcf.ucam.org>
	<20110610165529.GC2230@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20110610170535.GC25774@srcf.ucam.org>
	<20110610171939.GE2230@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20110610172307.GA27630@srcf.ucam.org>
	<20110610175248.GF2230@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20110610180807.GB28500@srcf.ucam.org>
	<20110610184738.GG2230@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20110610192329.GA30496@srcf.ucam.org>
	<20110610193713.GJ2230@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20110610201240.GA31474@srcf.ucam.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:37:13PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 08:23:29PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:47:38AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > 
> > > And if I understand you correctly, then the patches that Ankita posted
> > > should help your self-refresh case, along with the originally intended
> > > the power-down case and special-purpose use of memory case.
> > 
> > Yeah, I'd hope so once we actually have capable hardware.
> 
> Cool!!!
> 
> So Ankita's patchset might be useful to you at some point, then.
> 
> Does it look like a reasonable implementation?

I should read it before saying anything, I suspect...

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org