From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:19:27 +0300 Subject: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] ARM IRQ Kconfig patches In-Reply-To: <20110615152444.GZ471@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> References: <1308142960-20767-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <20110615151422.GA2618@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110615152444.GZ471@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Message-ID: <20110616091926.GI12230@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 06:24:45PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:14:22PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:02:38PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > I have lost count how many times I have sent > > > these patches. Will someone either take them > > > in or NAK them so I stop sending ?? > > > > It might help to copy the MMP and PXA people so that we get to hear > > their side of the story. It may be that they always require sparse > > IRQ support to be enabled. > > > > 'cause at the moment I've no idea whether your patch is right or not. > > I'll do so... thanks, at least one reply :-D seems like these aren't needed anymore. HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ is selected for the entire ARM architecture. Sorry for the noise. -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: