From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org (Samuel Thibault)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:47:37 +0200
Subject: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinxz1T7uPAS0u=gth3hAh+SFQkTQQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinRGRUxKB=C_2Y2F93czWScEUo+Jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110616085547.GH4935@const.famille.thibault.fr>
	<BANLkTinxz1T7uPAS0u=gth3hAh+SFQkTQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110616094737.GB5583@const.bordeaux.inria.fr>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Vincent Guittot, le Thu 16 Jun 2011 11:44:30 +0200, a ?crit :
> The output of hwloc-gather-topology is :
> 
> Machine (phys=0 local=280840KB total=280840KB)
>   Socket #0 (phys=3)
>     Core #0 (phys=0)
>       PU #0 (phys=0)
>     Core #1 (phys=1)
>       PU #1 (phys=1)
> depth 0:        1 Machine (type #1)
>  depth 1:       1 Socket (type #3)
>   depth 2:      2 Cores (type #5)
>    depth 3:     2 PUs (type #6)
> Topology not from this system
> 
> let me know if it's what you want

This looks good for a bicore socket, yes.  Could you send me the tarball
it created, so we can include it in the hwloc testsuite?

Do you have a example with smt cores?

Samuel