From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: i.MX consolidation patches
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:32:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110622083257.GK6069@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110622081141.GN23234@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:11:41AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:56:15AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Coming back to this topic after a longer time, here is an updated
> > patch doing exactly this.
>
> I'm not sure that this is actually correct. Whether ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT
> is enabled or not only affects the Image and not the zImage - provided
> the mach-* provides the zreladdr in their Makefile.boot, you can build
> a uImage with ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT.
>
> Where things become sticky is when AUTO_ZRELADDR is enabled - this is where
> the ZRELADDR may be omitted, and therefore there is no load/start address
> which can be provided to uboot.
>
> > $(obj)/uImage: STARTADDR=$(LOADADDR)
> >
> > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT),y)
>
> So maybe this wants to be ifeq ($(LOADADDR),) or CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR?
LOADADDR is always set. Given the following in Makefile.boot:
zreladdr-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX1) := 0x08008000
zreladdr-$(CONFIG_MACH_MX21) := 0xC0008000
zreladdr-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX25) := 0x80008000
zreladdr-$(CONFIG_MACH_MX27) := 0xA0008000
LOADADDR ends up being 0xA0008000 when all of the above are enabled.
Another idea I had was to replace the := with += so that we can
count the words in zreladdr-y and bail out if we have multiple
zreladdrs. I haven't really followed this approach as it means adjusting
all Makefile.boot.
CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR=y also does not necessarily mean that the resulting
uImage will not work. In the above example the image will work on i.MX27
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-19 16:47 i.MX consolidation patches Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 1/8] ARM i.MX: fix last user of iomux.h and remove it Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/8] ARM i.MX: define CLOCK_TICK_RATE to bogus value Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 3/8] ARM i.MX: remove SoC defines around header includes Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 4/8] ARM i.MX: dmav1: kill SoC ifdefs Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 5/8] ARM i.MX Allow to compile together i.MX1/21/25/27 Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 18:04 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-05-19 19:03 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 19:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-19 19:50 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-01 13:22 ` [PATCH 5/8 v2] " Sascha Hauer
2011-06-01 13:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-01 15:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-01 16:47 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-01 17:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 6/8] ARM i.MX mxc.h: use CONFIG_SOC_* instead of CONFIG_ARCH_* Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM i.MX debug macro: " Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:54 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-05-19 19:07 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 16:47 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: mxc: update defconfigs Sascha Hauer
2011-05-30 7:57 ` i.MX consolidation patches Shawn Guo
2011-06-01 12:35 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-01 13:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-01 14:18 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-01 14:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-01 14:36 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-01 14:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-06-22 7:56 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-22 8:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 8:32 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2011-06-22 9:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 14:58 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-22 15:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-22 15:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 15:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-22 15:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 16:35 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-01 21:08 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-06-01 23:04 ` Matt Sealey
2011-06-02 10:34 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-02 11:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-02 15:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-06-02 23:59 ` Matt Sealey
2011-06-03 12:02 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-03 12:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-06-03 14:18 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110622083257.GK6069@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).