From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:09:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCHv2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix loops_per_jiffy calculation
In-Reply-To: <B85A65D85D7EB246BE421B3FB0FBB593024D6C2FE3@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
References: <1308923618-5333-1-git-send-email-premi@ti.com>
	<20110624140142.GM9449@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<B85A65D85D7EB246BE421B3FB0FBB593024D6C2EF2@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
	<20110624141402.GN9449@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20110624151201.GO9449@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<4E04DBF8.1050401@ti.com>
	<B85A65D85D7EB246BE421B3FB0FBB593024D6C2FE3@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
Message-ID: <20110625190922.GA7736@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:23:31AM +0530, Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
> [sp] I thought we were solving a problem - but this makes it
>      look like race for addding sign-offs - which I am not
>      interested in.

No, it's called packaging the patch up and getting it ready, putting it
out on the list for people to test and provide Tested-by's, acked-by's
etc.

Would you rather people sat on fixes doing nothing with them for a
month instead, watching broken -rc after broken -rc going by?