linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 00/12] use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:30:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110630133003.GZ21898@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201106301512.46788.arnd@arndb.de>

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 03:12:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I think this looks good enough to merge into the linux-mmc tree, the code is
> clean and the benefits are clear.
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> One logical follow-up as both a cleanup and performance optimization would be
> to get rid of the mmc_queue_thread completely. When mmc_blk_issue_rq() is
> non-blocking always, you can call it directly from the mmc_request()
> function, instead of waking up another thread to do it for you.

It isn't anywhere near that - because you need to wait for the
request to complete, then analyze the results and if there has been
an error, send more commands and wait for their response.

To do all that in an asynchronous fashion will just create a mess of
small little functions with hard to understand code.  It's far better
to do all that in a clear procedural way in a thread.

We've been here before - with PCMCIA's card insertion code, where you
have to go through a sequence of events (insert, power up, reset, etc).
The PCMCIA code used to have a collection of small functions to do
each step, one chained after the other in a state machine fashion.
The result was horrid.  That's exactly what you'll end up with here.

Threads have their place, and this is one of them.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-30 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-28  8:11 [PATCH v8 00/12] use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] omap_hsmmc: add support for pre_req and post_req Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] mmci: implement pre_req() and post_req() Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] mmc: mmc_test: add debugfs file to list all tests Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] mmc: mmc_test: add test for non-blocking transfers Per Forlin
2011-07-01 13:29   ` Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] mmc: mmc_test: test to measure how sg_len affect performance Per Forlin
2011-07-01 13:33   ` Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] mmc: block: add member in mmc queue struct to hold request data Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] mmc: block: add a block request prepare function Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] mmc: block: move error code in issue_rw_rq to a separate function Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] mmc: queue: add a second mmc queue request member Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] mmc: core: add random fault injection Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] mmc: block: add handling for two parallel block requests in issue_rw_rq Per Forlin
2011-06-28  9:39   ` Per Forlin
2011-06-28  9:54 ` [PATCH v8 00/12] use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency Kyungmin Park
2011-06-30 12:36 ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-06-30 13:11   ` S, Venkatraman
2011-06-30 13:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-30 13:30   ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-07-01 16:44     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-02 12:29       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-02 19:37         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-03 20:53           ` Per Forlin
2011-07-04  1:07             ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-07-01 14:39 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110630133003.GZ21898@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).