From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sameo@linux.intel.com (Samuel Ortiz) Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:37:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Add tps65921 chip In-Reply-To: <20110701073557.GF23145@atomide.com> References: <1308066307-415-1-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru> <1308066307-415-3-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru> <20110701073557.GF23145@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20110701113726.GJ12106@sortiz-mobl> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Tony, On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 12:35:58AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Samuel, > > * green at linuxhacker.ru [110614 08:42]: > > From: Oleg Drokin > > > > Very similar to TPS65920 > > List of differences: http://www.ti.com/litv/pdf/swcu066b > > > > CC: sameo at linux.intel.com > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin > > Looks like this one can be merged independently of the rest of the > Nook patches via your mfd tree. Care to queue this? I asked Oleg to rebase this patch against my for-next branch as it was not applying cleanly. But I never got the fixed patch. I fixed it up now, and it's applied. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/