From: mingo@elte.hu (Ingo Molnar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] Enhance /dev/mem to allow read/write of arbitrary physical addresses
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 18:13:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110701161345.GA29775@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0DEF2C.3040504@zytor.com>
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 08:36 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > So we could kill multiple birds with the same stone here:
> >
> > - remove various ugly uses of /dev/mem (including the rootkit usage),
> > with or without strict-devmem
> >
> > - extending it to above-4G for inspection purposes
> >
> > - allowing to kill /dev/mem access runtime similar to the
> > disable_modules lock-down killswitch, for the so inclined.
> >
> > Would you be interested in modifying your patch-set in such a
> > fashion?
> >
>
> There is another use that I have looked at, as well: for testing
> purposes, it would be extremely good to be able to dirty and/or
> flush an arbitrary physical cache line for testing purposes.
>
> This is very very similar to /dev/mem usage -- access to an
> arbitrary chunk of memory -- and a fully enabled /dev/mem can of
> course support this use (just mmap the page with the relevant cache
> line). However, it could also be a separate device which could
> have looser permissions than /dev/mem; or a set of ioctls on
> /dev/mem with a separate kill switch, because no data would ever be
> have modified or returned to user space.
>
> Either way, though, we found that it would share a lot of code with
> the /dev/mem implementation, and as such fixing up the underlying
> machinery is the sanest way to upstream this.
To me that cache flush thing sounds obscure (but still useful) enough
to justify a new ioctl over /dev/mem.
Not sure it even needs a killswitch, unless there's some real
security problem related to it.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-01 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-17 8:38 [PATCH 00/10] Enhance /dev/mem to allow read/write of arbitrary physical addresses Petr Tesarik
2011-06-17 8:46 ` [PATCH 07/10] arm: change valid_phys_addr_range's @addr param to phys_addr_t Petr Tesarik
2011-06-17 9:30 ` [PATCH 00/10] Enhance /dev/mem to allow read/write of arbitrary physical addresses Ingo Molnar
2011-06-17 9:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-17 9:55 ` Petr Tesarik
2011-06-20 2:42 ` Américo Wang
2011-06-27 7:46 ` Petr Tesarik
2011-06-19 23:02 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-06-19 23:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-20 7:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-20 15:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-20 16:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-20 16:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-21 6:55 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-06-20 0:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-06-20 0:46 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-06-20 0:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-06-20 1:02 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-06-20 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-20 8:03 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-06-20 17:10 ` Ray Lee
2011-06-29 9:05 ` Petr Tesarik
2011-07-01 12:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 13:43 ` Petr Tesarik
2011-07-01 13:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-01 14:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-01 14:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 14:54 ` Petr Tesarik
2011-07-01 15:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 16:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-01 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-07-01 19:34 ` Petr Tesarik
2011-07-01 19:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 20:44 ` Petr Tesarik
2011-07-03 19:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-05 17:49 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-07-05 17:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-05 22:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110701161345.GA29775@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).