From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 23:52:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Add tps65921 chip
In-Reply-To: <20110701113726.GJ12106@sortiz-mobl>
References: <1308066307-415-1-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru>
	<1308066307-415-3-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru>
	<20110701073557.GF23145@atomide.com>
	<20110701113726.GJ12106@sortiz-mobl>
Message-ID: <20110704065238.GO23145@atomide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

* Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> [110701 04:32]:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 12:35:58AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Samuel,
> > 
> > * green at linuxhacker.ru <green@linuxhacker.ru> [110614 08:42]:
> > > From: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
> > > 
> > > Very similar to TPS65920
> > > List of differences: http://www.ti.com/litv/pdf/swcu066b
> > > 
> > > CC: sameo at linux.intel.com
> > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
> > 
> > Looks like this one can be merged independently of the rest of the
> > Nook patches via your mfd tree. Care to queue this?
> I asked Oleg to rebase this patch against my for-next branch as it was not
> applying cleanly. But I never got the fixed patch.
> I fixed it up now, and it's applied.

OK thanks!

Tony