From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely) Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 09:33:25 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] serial/imx: add device tree probe support In-Reply-To: <20110704073826.GC4338@pengutronix.de> References: <1309679760-22796-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1309679760-22796-3-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20110704065820.GY6069@pengutronix.de> <20110704073826.GC4338@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20110704153325.GC29977@ponder.secretlab.ca> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:38:26AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:58:20AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:56:00PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > It adds device tree probe support for imx tty/serial driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Liu > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo > > > Cc: Sascha Hauer > > > Cc: Alan Cox > > > Cc: Grant Likely > > > --- > > > .../bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt | 19 +++++ > > > drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++--- > > > 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..a9c0406 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ > > > +* Freescale i.MX Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter (UART) > > > + > > > +Required properties: > > > +- compatible : Should be "fsl,-uart" > > > +- reg : Address and length of the register set for the device > > > +- interrupts : Should contain uart interrupt > > > + > > > +Optional properties: > > > +- fsl,uart-has-rtscts : Indicate the uart has rts and cts > > > +- fsl,irda-mode : Indicate the uart supports irda mode > > > + > > > +Example: > > > + > > > +uart at 73fbc000 { > > > + compatible = "fsl,imx51-uart", "fsl,imx21-uart"; > > > + reg = <0x73fbc000 0x4000>; > > > + interrupts = <31>; > > > + fsl,uart-has-rtscts; > > > +}; > > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c > > > index 983f3bd..483c447 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c > > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c > > > @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > > > > #include > > > #include > > > @@ -239,6 +241,12 @@ static struct platform_device_id imx_uart_devtype[] = { > > > } > > > }; > > > > > > +static struct of_device_id imx_uart_dt_ids[] = { > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx1-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX1_UART], }, > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx21-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], }, > > > + { /* sentinel */ }, > > > +}; > > > > Isn't this table a bit too small? What about the other SoCs? > I'd expect that using fsl,imx21-uart on imx51 would result in a working > port, but it feels stange and if that's the intention the example above > needs fixing. If the newer parts claim compatibility with the older, then have a terse of_device_id table is just fine. ie, the compatible property for an imx51 would be: compatible = "fsl,imx51-uart", "fsl,imx21-uart"; It would only be wrong if the device tree node omitted the "fsl,imx51-uart" value from the list. g.