* [PATCH 0/2] Add device tree probe for imx/mxc gpio
@ 2011-07-03 8:16 Shawn Guo
2011-07-03 8:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() Shawn Guo
2011-07-03 8:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio/mxc: add device tree probe support Shawn Guo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-03 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The first patch removes the uses of cpu_is_mx(), and can be merged
right way when review gets done. The second patch adds device tree
probe, and again depends on the patch adding of_alias_get_id()
support.
Shawn Guo (2):
gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx()
gpio/mxc: add device tree probe support
.../devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.txt | 22 +++
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c | 8 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c | 12 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c | 8 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c | 12 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c | 6 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c | 6 +-
arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c | 12 +-
arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c | 22 ++--
arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c | 4 +-
arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 163 +++++++++++++++++--
12 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-03 8:16 [PATCH 0/2] Add device tree probe for imx/mxc gpio Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-03 8:16 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 6:10 ` Grant Likely 2011-07-04 6:46 ` Sascha Hauer 2011-07-03 8:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio/mxc: add device tree probe support Shawn Guo 1 sibling, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-03 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel The patch removes all the uses of cpu_is_mx(). Instead, it utilizes platform_device_id to distinguish the gpio differences among SoCs. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> --- arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c | 8 +- arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c | 12 +- arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c | 8 +- arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c | 12 +- arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c | 6 +- arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c | 6 +- arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c | 12 +- arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c | 22 ++-- arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c | 4 +- arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 2 +- drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++---- 11 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c index f2a6566..2bded59 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c @@ -50,12 +50,12 @@ void __init mx1_init_irq(void) void __init imx1_soc_init(void) { - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX1_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 0, MX1_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTA, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX1_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 1, MX1_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTB, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX1_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 2, MX1_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTC, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX1_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 3, MX1_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTD, 0); } diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c index 4f32a8a..d02e20d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ void __init mx21_init_irq(void) void __init imx21_soc_init(void) { - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX21_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX21_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX21_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX21_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX21_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX21_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 0, MX21_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 1, MX21_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 2, MX21_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 3, MX21_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 4, MX21_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 5, MX21_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); imx_add_imx_dma(); } diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c index 1e0c956..bbe93a5 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c @@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx25_sdma_pdata __initdata = { void __init imx25_soc_init(void) { - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); imx_add_imx_sdma(MX25_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX25_INT_SDMA, &imx25_sdma_pdata); } diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c index 944e02d..5a62969 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ void __init mx27_init_irq(void) void __init imx27_soc_init(void) { - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); imx_add_imx_dma(); } diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c index a1ff96f..7017c4a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ void __init imx31_soc_init(void) { int to_version = mx31_revision() >> 4; - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX31_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO1, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX31_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO2, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX31_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO3, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX31_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO1, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX31_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO2, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX31_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO3, 0); if (to_version == 1) { strncpy(imx31_sdma_pdata.fw_name, "sdma-imx31-to1.bin", diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c index da530ca..568a5c6 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ void __init imx35_soc_init(void) { int to_version = mx35_revision() >> 4; - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); if (to_version == 1) { strncpy(imx35_sdma_pdata.fw_name, "sdma-imx35-to1.bin", diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c index 28c3f60..39e4a17 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c @@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ void __init mx50_init_irq(void) void __init imx50_soc_init(void) { - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); } diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c index 1b7059f..1444140 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c @@ -142,23 +142,23 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx53_sdma_pdata __initdata = { void __init imx51_soc_init(void) { - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); imx_add_imx_sdma(MX51_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX51_INT_SDMA, &imx51_sdma_pdata); } void __init imx53_soc_init(void) { - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); imx_add_imx_sdma(MX53_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX53_INT_SDMA, &imx53_sdma_pdata); } diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c index cf1b7fd..a7919a2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ */ #include <mach/devices-common.h> -struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(int id, +struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(char *name, int id, resource_size_t iobase, resource_size_t iosize, int irq, int irq_high) { struct resource res[] = { @@ -28,5 +28,5 @@ struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(int id, }; return platform_device_register_resndata(&mxc_aips_bus, - "gpio-mxc", id, res, ARRAY_SIZE(res), NULL, 0); + name, id, res, ARRAY_SIZE(res), NULL, 0); } diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h index 91fa263..4e3d978 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ extern int mx51_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc, unsigned long ckih1, unsigned long ckih2); extern int mx53_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc, unsigned long ckih1, unsigned long ckih2); -extern struct platform_device *mxc_register_gpio(int id, +extern struct platform_device *mxc_register_gpio(char *name, int id, resource_size_t iobase, resource_size_t iosize, int irq, int irq_high); extern int mxc_register_device(struct platform_device *pdev, void *data); extern void mxc_set_cpu_type(unsigned int type); diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c index 2f6a81b..7ae71d6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c @@ -27,9 +27,34 @@ #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> -#include <mach/hardware.h> #include <asm-generic/bug.h> +enum mxc_gpio_type { + IMX1_GPIO, + IMX2_GPIO, + IMX_GPIO, +}; + +/* device type dependent stuff */ +struct mxc_gpio_hwdata { + unsigned dr_reg; + unsigned gdir_reg; + unsigned psr_reg; + unsigned icr1_reg; + unsigned icr2_reg; + unsigned imr_reg; + unsigned isr_reg; + unsigned low_level; + unsigned high_level; + unsigned rise_edge; + unsigned fall_edge; +}; + +struct mxc_gpio_data { + struct mxc_gpio_hwdata *hwdata; + enum mxc_gpio_type devtype; +}; + struct mxc_gpio_port { struct list_head node; void __iomem *base; @@ -38,6 +63,82 @@ struct mxc_gpio_port { int virtual_irq_start; struct bgpio_chip bgc; u32 both_edges; + struct mxc_gpio_data *devdata; +}; + +#define IS_IMX2_GPIO() (port->devdata->devtype == IMX2_GPIO) + +#define GPIO_DR (port->devdata->hwdata->dr_reg) +#define GPIO_GDIR (port->devdata->hwdata->gdir_reg) +#define GPIO_PSR (port->devdata->hwdata->psr_reg) +#define GPIO_ICR1 (port->devdata->hwdata->icr1_reg) +#define GPIO_ICR2 (port->devdata->hwdata->icr2_reg) +#define GPIO_IMR (port->devdata->hwdata->imr_reg) +#define GPIO_ISR (port->devdata->hwdata->isr_reg) + +#define GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV (port->devdata->hwdata->low_level) +#define GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV (port->devdata->hwdata->high_level) +#define GPIO_INT_RISE_EDGE (port->devdata->hwdata->rise_edge) +#define GPIO_INT_FALL_EDGE (port->devdata->hwdata->fall_edge) +#define GPIO_INT_NONE 0x4 + +static struct mxc_gpio_hwdata mxc_gpio_hwdata[] = { + [0] = { + .dr_reg = 0x1c, + .gdir_reg = 0x00, + .psr_reg = 0x24, + .icr1_reg = 0x28, + .icr2_reg = 0x2c, + .imr_reg = 0x30, + .isr_reg = 0x34, + .low_level = 0x03, + .high_level = 0x02, + .rise_edge = 0x00, + .fall_edge = 0x01, + }, + [1] = { + .dr_reg = 0x00, + .gdir_reg = 0x04, + .psr_reg = 0x08, + .icr1_reg = 0x0c, + .icr2_reg = 0x10, + .imr_reg = 0x14, + .isr_reg = 0x18, + .low_level = 0x00, + .high_level = 0x01, + .rise_edge = 0x02, + .fall_edge = 0x03, + }, +}; + +static struct mxc_gpio_data mxc_gpio_devdata[] = { + [IMX1_GPIO] = { + .hwdata = &mxc_gpio_hwdata[0], + .devtype = IMX1_GPIO, + }, + [IMX2_GPIO] = { + .hwdata = &mxc_gpio_hwdata[0], + .devtype = IMX2_GPIO, + }, + [IMX_GPIO] = { + .hwdata = &mxc_gpio_hwdata[1], + .devtype = IMX_GPIO, + }, +}; + +static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { + { + .name = "imx1-gpio", + .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, + }, { + .name = "imx2-gpio", + .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, + }, { + .name = "imx-gpio", + .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, + }, { + /* sentinel */ + } }; /* @@ -47,22 +148,6 @@ struct mxc_gpio_port { */ static LIST_HEAD(mxc_gpio_ports); -#define cpu_is_mx1_mx2() (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx2()) - -#define GPIO_DR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x1c : 0x00) -#define GPIO_GDIR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x00 : 0x04) -#define GPIO_PSR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x24 : 0x08) -#define GPIO_ICR1 (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x28 : 0x0C) -#define GPIO_ICR2 (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x2C : 0x10) -#define GPIO_IMR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x30 : 0x14) -#define GPIO_ISR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x34 : 0x18) - -#define GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x3 : 0x0) -#define GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x2 : 0x1) -#define GPIO_INT_RISE_EDGE (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x0 : 0x2) -#define GPIO_INT_FALL_EDGE (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x1 : 0x3) -#define GPIO_INT_NONE 0x4 - /* Note: This driver assumes 32 GPIOs are handled in one register */ static int gpio_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type) @@ -246,6 +331,7 @@ static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!port) return -ENOMEM; + port->devdata = &mxc_gpio_devdata[pdev->id_entry->driver_data]; port->virtual_irq_start = MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START + pdev->id * 32; iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); @@ -280,7 +366,7 @@ static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* gpio-mxc can be a generic irq chip */ mxc_gpio_init_gc(port); - if (cpu_is_mx2()) { + if (IS_IMX2_GPIO()) { /* setup one handler for all GPIO interrupts */ if (pdev->id == 0) irq_set_chained_handler(port->irq, @@ -332,6 +418,7 @@ static struct platform_driver mxc_gpio_driver = { .owner = THIS_MODULE, }, .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, + .id_table = mxc_gpio_devtype, }; static int __init gpio_mxc_init(void) -- 1.7.4.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-03 8:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-04 6:10 ` Grant Likely 2011-07-04 6:11 ` Grant Likely 2011-07-04 16:56 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 6:46 ` Sascha Hauer 1 sibling, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2011-07-04 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 04:16:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > The patch removes all the uses of cpu_is_mx(). Instead, it utilizes > platform_device_id to distinguish the gpio differences among SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> > --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c | 8 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c | 12 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c | 8 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c | 12 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c | 6 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c | 6 +- > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c | 12 +- > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c | 22 ++-- > arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c | 4 +- > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > 11 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c > index f2a6566..2bded59 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c > @@ -50,12 +50,12 @@ void __init mx1_init_irq(void) > > void __init imx1_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX1_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 0, MX1_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTA, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX1_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 1, MX1_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTB, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX1_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 2, MX1_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTC, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX1_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 3, MX1_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTD, 0); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c > index 4f32a8a..d02e20d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c > @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ void __init mx21_init_irq(void) > > void __init imx21_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX21_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX21_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX21_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX21_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX21_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX21_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 0, MX21_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 1, MX21_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 2, MX21_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 3, MX21_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 4, MX21_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 5, MX21_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > imx_add_imx_dma(); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > index 1e0c956..bbe93a5 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > @@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx25_sdma_pdata __initdata = { > > void __init imx25_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); > > imx_add_imx_sdma(MX25_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX25_INT_SDMA, &imx25_sdma_pdata); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > index 944e02d..5a62969 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ void __init mx27_init_irq(void) > > void __init imx27_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > imx_add_imx_dma(); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c > index a1ff96f..7017c4a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c > @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ void __init imx31_soc_init(void) > { > int to_version = mx31_revision() >> 4; > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX31_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO1, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX31_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO2, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX31_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO3, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX31_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO1, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX31_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO2, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX31_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > if (to_version == 1) { > strncpy(imx31_sdma_pdata.fw_name, "sdma-imx31-to1.bin", > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > index da530ca..568a5c6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ void __init imx35_soc_init(void) > { > int to_version = mx35_revision() >> 4; > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > if (to_version == 1) { > strncpy(imx35_sdma_pdata.fw_name, "sdma-imx35-to1.bin", > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > index 28c3f60..39e4a17 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > @@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ void __init mx50_init_irq(void) > > void __init imx50_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > index 1b7059f..1444140 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > @@ -142,23 +142,23 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx53_sdma_pdata __initdata = { > > void __init imx51_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > imx_add_imx_sdma(MX51_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX51_INT_SDMA, &imx51_sdma_pdata); > } > > void __init imx53_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); > > imx_add_imx_sdma(MX53_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX53_INT_SDMA, &imx53_sdma_pdata); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c > index cf1b7fd..a7919a2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ > */ > #include <mach/devices-common.h> > > -struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(int id, > +struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(char *name, int id, > resource_size_t iobase, resource_size_t iosize, int irq, int irq_high) > { > struct resource res[] = { > @@ -28,5 +28,5 @@ struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(int id, > }; > > return platform_device_register_resndata(&mxc_aips_bus, > - "gpio-mxc", id, res, ARRAY_SIZE(res), NULL, 0); > + name, id, res, ARRAY_SIZE(res), NULL, 0); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h > index 91fa263..4e3d978 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h > @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ extern int mx51_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc, > unsigned long ckih1, unsigned long ckih2); > extern int mx53_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc, > unsigned long ckih1, unsigned long ckih2); > -extern struct platform_device *mxc_register_gpio(int id, > +extern struct platform_device *mxc_register_gpio(char *name, int id, > resource_size_t iobase, resource_size_t iosize, int irq, int irq_high); > extern int mxc_register_device(struct platform_device *pdev, void *data); > extern void mxc_set_cpu_type(unsigned int type); > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > index 2f6a81b..7ae71d6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > @@ -27,9 +27,34 @@ > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> > -#include <mach/hardware.h> > #include <asm-generic/bug.h> > > +enum mxc_gpio_type { > + IMX1_GPIO, > + IMX2_GPIO, > + IMX_GPIO, > +}; > + > +/* device type dependent stuff */ > +struct mxc_gpio_hwdata { > + unsigned dr_reg; > + unsigned gdir_reg; > + unsigned psr_reg; > + unsigned icr1_reg; > + unsigned icr2_reg; > + unsigned imr_reg; > + unsigned isr_reg; > + unsigned low_level; > + unsigned high_level; > + unsigned rise_edge; > + unsigned fall_edge; > +}; > + > +struct mxc_gpio_data { > + struct mxc_gpio_hwdata *hwdata; > + enum mxc_gpio_type devtype; > +}; > + > struct mxc_gpio_port { > struct list_head node; > void __iomem *base; > @@ -38,6 +63,82 @@ struct mxc_gpio_port { > int virtual_irq_start; > struct bgpio_chip bgc; > u32 both_edges; > + struct mxc_gpio_data *devdata; > +}; > + > +#define IS_IMX2_GPIO() (port->devdata->devtype == IMX2_GPIO) 'tis better to program in C than CPP. :) A static inline would go better here. Also, when you change to using discrete mxc_gpio_hwdata instances instead of a single table, you can change this test to be: static inline int is_imx2_gpio(port) { return port->devdata == &imx2_gpio_hwdata; } > + > +#define GPIO_DR (port->devdata->hwdata->dr_reg) > +#define GPIO_GDIR (port->devdata->hwdata->gdir_reg) > +#define GPIO_PSR (port->devdata->hwdata->psr_reg) > +#define GPIO_ICR1 (port->devdata->hwdata->icr1_reg) > +#define GPIO_ICR2 (port->devdata->hwdata->icr2_reg) > +#define GPIO_IMR (port->devdata->hwdata->imr_reg) > +#define GPIO_ISR (port->devdata->hwdata->isr_reg) > + > +#define GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV (port->devdata->hwdata->low_level) > +#define GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV (port->devdata->hwdata->high_level) > +#define GPIO_INT_RISE_EDGE (port->devdata->hwdata->rise_edge) > +#define GPIO_INT_FALL_EDGE (port->devdata->hwdata->fall_edge) > +#define GPIO_INT_NONE 0x4 This ends up creating a lot more indirection in the driver which may have a measurable have a performance impact. Plus, these new macros depend on local context that will break in unexpected ways if someone changes the 'port' name. Unfortunately, to fix this property will require a lot more lines of code change because every GPIO_* reference will need to be fixed, but I'd rather see that than a set of ugly macros that just happen to be convenient in the short term. > + > +static struct mxc_gpio_hwdata mxc_gpio_hwdata[] = { > + [0] = { > + .dr_reg = 0x1c, > + .gdir_reg = 0x00, > + .psr_reg = 0x24, > + .icr1_reg = 0x28, > + .icr2_reg = 0x2c, > + .imr_reg = 0x30, > + .isr_reg = 0x34, > + .low_level = 0x03, > + .high_level = 0x02, > + .rise_edge = 0x00, > + .fall_edge = 0x01, > + }, > + [1] = { > + .dr_reg = 0x00, > + .gdir_reg = 0x04, > + .psr_reg = 0x08, > + .icr1_reg = 0x0c, > + .icr2_reg = 0x10, > + .imr_reg = 0x14, > + .isr_reg = 0x18, > + .low_level = 0x00, > + .high_level = 0x01, > + .rise_edge = 0x02, > + .fall_edge = 0x03, > + }, > +}; > + > +static struct mxc_gpio_data mxc_gpio_devdata[] = { > + [IMX1_GPIO] = { > + .hwdata = &mxc_gpio_hwdata[0], > + .devtype = IMX1_GPIO, > + }, > + [IMX2_GPIO] = { > + .hwdata = &mxc_gpio_hwdata[0], > + .devtype = IMX2_GPIO, > + }, > + [IMX_GPIO] = { > + .hwdata = &mxc_gpio_hwdata[1], > + .devtype = IMX_GPIO, > + }, > +}; > + > +static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { > + { > + .name = "imx1-gpio", > + .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, > + }, { > + .name = "imx2-gpio", > + .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, > + }, { > + .name = "imx-gpio", > + .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > + }, { > + /* sentinel */ > + } > }; > > /* > @@ -47,22 +148,6 @@ struct mxc_gpio_port { > */ > static LIST_HEAD(mxc_gpio_ports); > > -#define cpu_is_mx1_mx2() (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx2()) > - > -#define GPIO_DR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x1c : 0x00) > -#define GPIO_GDIR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x00 : 0x04) > -#define GPIO_PSR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x24 : 0x08) > -#define GPIO_ICR1 (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x28 : 0x0C) > -#define GPIO_ICR2 (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x2C : 0x10) > -#define GPIO_IMR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x30 : 0x14) > -#define GPIO_ISR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x34 : 0x18) > - > -#define GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x3 : 0x0) > -#define GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x2 : 0x1) > -#define GPIO_INT_RISE_EDGE (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x0 : 0x2) > -#define GPIO_INT_FALL_EDGE (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x1 : 0x3) > -#define GPIO_INT_NONE 0x4 > - > /* Note: This driver assumes 32 GPIOs are handled in one register */ > > static int gpio_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type) > @@ -246,6 +331,7 @@ static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (!port) > return -ENOMEM; > > + port->devdata = &mxc_gpio_devdata[pdev->id_entry->driver_data]; > port->virtual_irq_start = MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START + pdev->id * 32; > > iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > @@ -280,7 +366,7 @@ static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > /* gpio-mxc can be a generic irq chip */ > mxc_gpio_init_gc(port); > > - if (cpu_is_mx2()) { > + if (IS_IMX2_GPIO()) { > /* setup one handler for all GPIO interrupts */ > if (pdev->id == 0) > irq_set_chained_handler(port->irq, > @@ -332,6 +418,7 @@ static struct platform_driver mxc_gpio_driver = { > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > }, > .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, > + .id_table = mxc_gpio_devtype, > }; > > static int __init gpio_mxc_init(void) > -- > 1.7.4.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-04 6:10 ` Grant Likely @ 2011-07-04 6:11 ` Grant Likely 2011-07-04 16:56 ` Shawn Guo 1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2011-07-04 6:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 04:16:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: >> The patch removes all the uses of cpu_is_mx(). ?Instead, it utilizes >> platform_device_id to distinguish the gpio differences among SoCs. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> >> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> >> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> >> --- >> ?arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?8 +- >> ?arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 12 +- >> ?arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?8 +- >> ?arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 12 +- >> ?arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?6 +- >> ?arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?6 +- >> ?arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? 12 +- >> ?arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 22 ++-- >> ?arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c | ? ?4 +- >> ?arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h ? ? ? | ? ?2 +- >> ?drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ?123 +++++++++++++++++++++---- >> ?11 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) ... but other than the comments I made, I fully support making this change. It should also be able to be complete for v3.1 g. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-04 6:10 ` Grant Likely 2011-07-04 6:11 ` Grant Likely @ 2011-07-04 16:56 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 16:59 ` Grant Likely 1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-04 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:10:28AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 04:16:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > The patch removes all the uses of cpu_is_mx(). Instead, it utilizes > > platform_device_id to distinguish the gpio differences among SoCs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c | 8 +- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c | 12 +- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c | 8 +- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c | 12 +- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c | 6 +- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c | 6 +- > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c | 12 +- > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c | 22 ++-- > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c | 4 +- > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 2 +- > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > > 11 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c > > index f2a6566..2bded59 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c > > @@ -50,12 +50,12 @@ void __init mx1_init_irq(void) > > > > void __init imx1_soc_init(void) > > { > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX1_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 0, MX1_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTA, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX1_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 1, MX1_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTB, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX1_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 2, MX1_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTC, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX1_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 3, MX1_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTD, 0); > > } > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c > > index 4f32a8a..d02e20d 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c > > @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ void __init mx21_init_irq(void) > > > > void __init imx21_soc_init(void) > > { > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX21_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX21_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX21_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX21_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX21_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX21_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 0, MX21_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 1, MX21_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 2, MX21_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 3, MX21_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 4, MX21_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 5, MX21_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > > imx_add_imx_dma(); > > } > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > > index 1e0c956..bbe93a5 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > > @@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx25_sdma_pdata __initdata = { > > > > void __init imx25_soc_init(void) > > { > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); > > > > imx_add_imx_sdma(MX25_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX25_INT_SDMA, &imx25_sdma_pdata); > > } > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > > index 944e02d..5a62969 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > > @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ void __init mx27_init_irq(void) > > > > void __init imx27_soc_init(void) > > { > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > > imx_add_imx_dma(); > > } > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c > > index a1ff96f..7017c4a 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c > > @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ void __init imx31_soc_init(void) > > { > > int to_version = mx31_revision() >> 4; > > > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX31_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX31_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX31_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX31_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX31_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX31_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > > > if (to_version == 1) { > > strncpy(imx31_sdma_pdata.fw_name, "sdma-imx31-to1.bin", > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > > index da530ca..568a5c6 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > > @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ void __init imx35_soc_init(void) > > { > > int to_version = mx35_revision() >> 4; > > > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > > > if (to_version == 1) { > > strncpy(imx35_sdma_pdata.fw_name, "sdma-imx35-to1.bin", > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > > index 28c3f60..39e4a17 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > > @@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ void __init mx50_init_irq(void) > > > > void __init imx50_soc_init(void) > > { > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > > } > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > > index 1b7059f..1444140 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > > @@ -142,23 +142,23 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx53_sdma_pdata __initdata = { > > > > void __init imx51_soc_init(void) > > { > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > > > imx_add_imx_sdma(MX51_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX51_INT_SDMA, &imx51_sdma_pdata); > > } > > > > void __init imx53_soc_init(void) > > { > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > > - mxc_register_gpio(6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); > > > > imx_add_imx_sdma(MX53_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX53_INT_SDMA, &imx53_sdma_pdata); > > } > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c > > index cf1b7fd..a7919a2 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c > > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ > > */ > > #include <mach/devices-common.h> > > > > -struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(int id, > > +struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(char *name, int id, > > resource_size_t iobase, resource_size_t iosize, int irq, int irq_high) > > { > > struct resource res[] = { > > @@ -28,5 +28,5 @@ struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(int id, > > }; > > > > return platform_device_register_resndata(&mxc_aips_bus, > > - "gpio-mxc", id, res, ARRAY_SIZE(res), NULL, 0); > > + name, id, res, ARRAY_SIZE(res), NULL, 0); > > } > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h > > index 91fa263..4e3d978 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h > > @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ extern int mx51_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc, > > unsigned long ckih1, unsigned long ckih2); > > extern int mx53_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc, > > unsigned long ckih1, unsigned long ckih2); > > -extern struct platform_device *mxc_register_gpio(int id, > > +extern struct platform_device *mxc_register_gpio(char *name, int id, > > resource_size_t iobase, resource_size_t iosize, int irq, int irq_high); > > extern int mxc_register_device(struct platform_device *pdev, void *data); > > extern void mxc_set_cpu_type(unsigned int type); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > > index 2f6a81b..7ae71d6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > > @@ -27,9 +27,34 @@ > > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> > > -#include <mach/hardware.h> > > #include <asm-generic/bug.h> > > > > +enum mxc_gpio_type { > > + IMX1_GPIO, > > + IMX2_GPIO, > > + IMX_GPIO, > > +}; > > + > > +/* device type dependent stuff */ > > +struct mxc_gpio_hwdata { > > + unsigned dr_reg; > > + unsigned gdir_reg; > > + unsigned psr_reg; > > + unsigned icr1_reg; > > + unsigned icr2_reg; > > + unsigned imr_reg; > > + unsigned isr_reg; > > + unsigned low_level; > > + unsigned high_level; > > + unsigned rise_edge; > > + unsigned fall_edge; > > +}; > > + > > +struct mxc_gpio_data { > > + struct mxc_gpio_hwdata *hwdata; > > + enum mxc_gpio_type devtype; > > +}; > > + > > struct mxc_gpio_port { > > struct list_head node; > > void __iomem *base; > > @@ -38,6 +63,82 @@ struct mxc_gpio_port { > > int virtual_irq_start; > > struct bgpio_chip bgc; > > u32 both_edges; > > + struct mxc_gpio_data *devdata; > > +}; > > + > > +#define IS_IMX2_GPIO() (port->devdata->devtype == IMX2_GPIO) > > 'tis better to program in C than CPP. :) A static inline would go better > here. > > Also, when you change to using discrete mxc_gpio_hwdata > instances instead of a single table, you can change this test to be: > > static inline int is_imx2_gpio(port) { > return port->devdata == &imx2_gpio_hwdata; > } > imx1 and imx2 shares the same hwdata, so we can not use the approach to distinguish imx2 from imx1. Anyway, I'm killing IS_IMX2_GPIO since it's only used once and does not deserve a macro or inline function. > > + > > +#define GPIO_DR (port->devdata->hwdata->dr_reg) > > +#define GPIO_GDIR (port->devdata->hwdata->gdir_reg) > > +#define GPIO_PSR (port->devdata->hwdata->psr_reg) > > +#define GPIO_ICR1 (port->devdata->hwdata->icr1_reg) > > +#define GPIO_ICR2 (port->devdata->hwdata->icr2_reg) > > +#define GPIO_IMR (port->devdata->hwdata->imr_reg) > > +#define GPIO_ISR (port->devdata->hwdata->isr_reg) > > + > > +#define GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV (port->devdata->hwdata->low_level) > > +#define GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV (port->devdata->hwdata->high_level) > > +#define GPIO_INT_RISE_EDGE (port->devdata->hwdata->rise_edge) > > +#define GPIO_INT_FALL_EDGE (port->devdata->hwdata->fall_edge) > > +#define GPIO_INT_NONE 0x4 > > This ends up creating a lot more indirection in the driver which may > have a measurable have a performance impact. Plus, these new macros > depend on local context that will break in unexpected ways if someone > changes the 'port' name. > > Unfortunately, to fix this property will require a lot more lines of > code change because every GPIO_* reference will need to be fixed, but > I'd rather see that than a set of ugly macros that just happen to be > convenient in the short term. > The comments remind me one fact that these stuff are actually soc dependent than port, because we can never run on a soc that gets UART1 as IMX1_GPIO while UART2 as IMX2_GPIO. The fact is if we are running on IMX1, all UART ports must be IMX1_GPIO, and if on IMX2, all ports must be IMX2_GPIO. Based on this observation, we can define global static variables for hwdata and hwtype and get them set up during probe for only one port, so that your above two concerns can be address without touch every GPIO_* lines. Here is the patch. Please let me know what you think. ---8<----------- diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c index 2f6a81b..19a173c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c @@ -27,9 +27,29 @@ #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> -#include <mach/hardware.h> #include <asm-generic/bug.h> +enum mxc_gpio_hwtype { + IMX1_GPIO, + IMX2_GPIO, + IMX_GPIO, +}; + +/* device type dependent stuff */ +struct mxc_gpio_hwdata { + unsigned dr_reg; + unsigned gdir_reg; + unsigned psr_reg; + unsigned icr1_reg; + unsigned icr2_reg; + unsigned imr_reg; + unsigned isr_reg; + unsigned low_level; + unsigned high_level; + unsigned rise_edge; + unsigned fall_edge; +}; + struct mxc_gpio_port { struct list_head node; void __iomem *base; @@ -40,6 +60,72 @@ struct mxc_gpio_port { u32 both_edges; }; +static struct mxc_gpio_hwdata imx1_imx2_gpio_hwdata = { + .dr_reg = 0x1c, + .gdir_reg = 0x00, + .psr_reg = 0x24, + .icr1_reg = 0x28, + .icr2_reg = 0x2c, + .imr_reg = 0x30, + .isr_reg = 0x34, + .low_level = 0x03, + .high_level = 0x02, + .rise_edge = 0x00, + .fall_edge = 0x01, +}; + +static struct mxc_gpio_hwdata imx_gpio_hwdata = { + .dr_reg = 0x00, + .gdir_reg = 0x04, + .psr_reg = 0x08, + .icr1_reg = 0x0c, + .icr2_reg = 0x10, + .imr_reg = 0x14, + .isr_reg = 0x18, + .low_level = 0x00, + .high_level = 0x01, + .rise_edge = 0x02, + .fall_edge = 0x03, +}; + +static enum mxc_gpio_hwtype mxs_gpio_hwtype; +static struct mxc_gpio_hwdata *mxc_gpio_hwdata; + +#define GPIO_DR (mxc_gpio_hwdata->dr_reg) +#define GPIO_GDIR (mxc_gpio_hwdata->gdir_reg) +#define GPIO_PSR (mxc_gpio_hwdata->psr_reg) +#define GPIO_ICR1 (mxc_gpio_hwdata->icr1_reg) +#define GPIO_ICR2 (mxc_gpio_hwdata->icr2_reg) +#define GPIO_IMR (mxc_gpio_hwdata->imr_reg) +#define GPIO_ISR (mxc_gpio_hwdata->isr_reg) + +#define GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV (mxc_gpio_hwdata->low_level) +#define GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV (mxc_gpio_hwdata->high_level) +#define GPIO_INT_RISE_EDGE (mxc_gpio_hwdata->rise_edge) +#define GPIO_INT_FALL_EDGE (mxc_gpio_hwdata->fall_edge) +#define GPIO_INT_NONE 0x4 + +static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { + { + .name = "imx1-gpio", + .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, + }, { + .name = "imx21-gpio", + .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, + }, { + .name = "imx25-gpio", + .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, + }, { + .name = "imx27-gpio", + .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, + }, { + .name = "imx-gpio", + .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, + }, { + /* sentinel */ + } +}; + /* * MX2 has one interrupt *for all* gpio ports. The list is used * to save the references to all ports, so that mx2_gpio_irq_handler @@ -47,22 +133,6 @@ struct mxc_gpio_port { */ static LIST_HEAD(mxc_gpio_ports); -#define cpu_is_mx1_mx2() (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx2()) - -#define GPIO_DR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x1c : 0x00) -#define GPIO_GDIR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x00 : 0x04) -#define GPIO_PSR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x24 : 0x08) -#define GPIO_ICR1 (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x28 : 0x0C) -#define GPIO_ICR2 (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x2C : 0x10) -#define GPIO_IMR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x30 : 0x14) -#define GPIO_ISR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x34 : 0x18) - -#define GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x3 : 0x0) -#define GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x2 : 0x1) -#define GPIO_INT_RISE_EDGE (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x0 : 0x2) -#define GPIO_INT_FALL_EDGE (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x1 : 0x3) -#define GPIO_INT_NONE 0x4 - /* Note: This driver assumes 32 GPIOs are handled in one register */ static int gpio_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type) @@ -236,12 +306,27 @@ static void __init mxc_gpio_init_gc(struct mxc_gpio_port *port) IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0); } +static void __devinit mxc_gpio_get_hw(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + if (mxc_gpio_hwdata) + return; + + mxs_gpio_hwtype = pdev->id_entry->driver_data; + + if (mxs_gpio_hwtype == IMX1_GPIO || mxs_gpio_hwtype == IMX2_GPIO) + mxc_gpio_hwdata = &imx1_imx2_gpio_hwdata; + else + mxc_gpio_hwdata = &imx_gpio_hwdata; +} + static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct mxc_gpio_port *port; struct resource *iores; int err; + mxc_gpio_get_hw(pdev); + port = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mxc_gpio_port), GFP_KERNEL); if (!port) return -ENOMEM; @@ -280,7 +365,7 @@ static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* gpio-mxc can be a generic irq chip */ mxc_gpio_init_gc(port); - if (cpu_is_mx2()) { + if (mxs_gpio_hwtype == IMX2_GPIO) { /* setup one handler for all GPIO interrupts */ if (pdev->id == 0) irq_set_chained_handler(port->irq, @@ -332,6 +417,7 @@ static struct platform_driver mxc_gpio_driver = { .owner = THIS_MODULE, }, .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, + .id_table = mxc_gpio_devtype, }; static int __init gpio_mxc_init(void) -- 1.7.4.1 -- Regards, Shawn ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-04 16:56 ` Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-04 16:59 ` Grant Likely 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2011-07-04 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 12:56:29AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:10:28AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 04:16:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > The patch removes all the uses of cpu_is_mx(). Instead, it utilizes > > > platform_device_id to distinguish the gpio differences among SoCs. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> > > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c | 8 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c | 12 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c | 8 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c | 12 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c | 6 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c | 6 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c | 12 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c | 22 ++-- > > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c | 4 +- > > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 2 +- > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > 11 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c > > > index f2a6566..2bded59 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c > > > @@ -50,12 +50,12 @@ void __init mx1_init_irq(void) > > > > > > void __init imx1_soc_init(void) > > > { > > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX1_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 0, MX1_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTA, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX1_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 1, MX1_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTB, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX1_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 2, MX1_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTC, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX1_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 3, MX1_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > > > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTD, 0); > > > } > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c > > > index 4f32a8a..d02e20d 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c > > > @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ void __init mx21_init_irq(void) > > > > > > void __init imx21_soc_init(void) > > > { > > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX21_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX21_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX21_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX21_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX21_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX21_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 0, MX21_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 1, MX21_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 2, MX21_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 3, MX21_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 4, MX21_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 5, MX21_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > > > > imx_add_imx_dma(); > > > } > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > > > index 1e0c956..bbe93a5 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > > > @@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx25_sdma_pdata __initdata = { > > > > > > void __init imx25_soc_init(void) > > > { > > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); > > > > > > imx_add_imx_sdma(MX25_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX25_INT_SDMA, &imx25_sdma_pdata); > > > } > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > > > index 944e02d..5a62969 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > > > @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ void __init mx27_init_irq(void) > > > > > > void __init imx27_soc_init(void) > > > { > > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > > > > imx_add_imx_dma(); > > > } > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c > > > index a1ff96f..7017c4a 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c > > > @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ void __init imx31_soc_init(void) > > > { > > > int to_version = mx31_revision() >> 4; > > > > > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX31_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX31_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX31_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX31_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX31_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX31_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > > > > > if (to_version == 1) { > > > strncpy(imx31_sdma_pdata.fw_name, "sdma-imx31-to1.bin", > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > > > index da530ca..568a5c6 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > > > @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ void __init imx35_soc_init(void) > > > { > > > int to_version = mx35_revision() >> 4; > > > > > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > > > > > if (to_version == 1) { > > > strncpy(imx35_sdma_pdata.fw_name, "sdma-imx35-to1.bin", > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > > > index 28c3f60..39e4a17 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > > > @@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ void __init mx50_init_irq(void) > > > > > > void __init imx50_soc_init(void) > > > { > > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > > > } > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > > > index 1b7059f..1444140 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > > > @@ -142,23 +142,23 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx53_sdma_pdata __initdata = { > > > > > > void __init imx51_soc_init(void) > > > { > > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > > > > > imx_add_imx_sdma(MX51_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX51_INT_SDMA, &imx51_sdma_pdata); > > > } > > > > > > void __init imx53_soc_init(void) > > > { > > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > > > - mxc_register_gpio(6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > > > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); > > > > > > imx_add_imx_sdma(MX53_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX53_INT_SDMA, &imx53_sdma_pdata); > > > } > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c > > > index cf1b7fd..a7919a2 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c > > > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ > > > */ > > > #include <mach/devices-common.h> > > > > > > -struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(int id, > > > +struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(char *name, int id, > > > resource_size_t iobase, resource_size_t iosize, int irq, int irq_high) > > > { > > > struct resource res[] = { > > > @@ -28,5 +28,5 @@ struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(int id, > > > }; > > > > > > return platform_device_register_resndata(&mxc_aips_bus, > > > - "gpio-mxc", id, res, ARRAY_SIZE(res), NULL, 0); > > > + name, id, res, ARRAY_SIZE(res), NULL, 0); > > > } > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h > > > index 91fa263..4e3d978 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h > > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h > > > @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ extern int mx51_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc, > > > unsigned long ckih1, unsigned long ckih2); > > > extern int mx53_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc, > > > unsigned long ckih1, unsigned long ckih2); > > > -extern struct platform_device *mxc_register_gpio(int id, > > > +extern struct platform_device *mxc_register_gpio(char *name, int id, > > > resource_size_t iobase, resource_size_t iosize, int irq, int irq_high); > > > extern int mxc_register_device(struct platform_device *pdev, void *data); > > > extern void mxc_set_cpu_type(unsigned int type); > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > > > index 2f6a81b..7ae71d6 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > > > @@ -27,9 +27,34 @@ > > > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > > #include <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> > > > -#include <mach/hardware.h> > > > #include <asm-generic/bug.h> > > > > > > +enum mxc_gpio_type { > > > + IMX1_GPIO, > > > + IMX2_GPIO, > > > + IMX_GPIO, > > > +}; > > > + > > > +/* device type dependent stuff */ > > > +struct mxc_gpio_hwdata { > > > + unsigned dr_reg; > > > + unsigned gdir_reg; > > > + unsigned psr_reg; > > > + unsigned icr1_reg; > > > + unsigned icr2_reg; > > > + unsigned imr_reg; > > > + unsigned isr_reg; > > > + unsigned low_level; > > > + unsigned high_level; > > > + unsigned rise_edge; > > > + unsigned fall_edge; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +struct mxc_gpio_data { > > > + struct mxc_gpio_hwdata *hwdata; > > > + enum mxc_gpio_type devtype; > > > +}; > > > + > > > struct mxc_gpio_port { > > > struct list_head node; > > > void __iomem *base; > > > @@ -38,6 +63,82 @@ struct mxc_gpio_port { > > > int virtual_irq_start; > > > struct bgpio_chip bgc; > > > u32 both_edges; > > > + struct mxc_gpio_data *devdata; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +#define IS_IMX2_GPIO() (port->devdata->devtype == IMX2_GPIO) > > > > 'tis better to program in C than CPP. :) A static inline would go better > > here. > > > > Also, when you change to using discrete mxc_gpio_hwdata > > instances instead of a single table, you can change this test to be: > > > > static inline int is_imx2_gpio(port) { > > return port->devdata == &imx2_gpio_hwdata; > > } > > > imx1 and imx2 shares the same hwdata, so we can not use the approach > to distinguish imx2 from imx1. > > Anyway, I'm killing IS_IMX2_GPIO since it's only used once and does > not deserve a macro or inline function. > > > > + > > > +#define GPIO_DR (port->devdata->hwdata->dr_reg) > > > +#define GPIO_GDIR (port->devdata->hwdata->gdir_reg) > > > +#define GPIO_PSR (port->devdata->hwdata->psr_reg) > > > +#define GPIO_ICR1 (port->devdata->hwdata->icr1_reg) > > > +#define GPIO_ICR2 (port->devdata->hwdata->icr2_reg) > > > +#define GPIO_IMR (port->devdata->hwdata->imr_reg) > > > +#define GPIO_ISR (port->devdata->hwdata->isr_reg) > > > + > > > +#define GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV (port->devdata->hwdata->low_level) > > > +#define GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV (port->devdata->hwdata->high_level) > > > +#define GPIO_INT_RISE_EDGE (port->devdata->hwdata->rise_edge) > > > +#define GPIO_INT_FALL_EDGE (port->devdata->hwdata->fall_edge) > > > +#define GPIO_INT_NONE 0x4 > > > > This ends up creating a lot more indirection in the driver which may > > have a measurable have a performance impact. Plus, these new macros > > depend on local context that will break in unexpected ways if someone > > changes the 'port' name. > > > > Unfortunately, to fix this property will require a lot more lines of > > code change because every GPIO_* reference will need to be fixed, but > > I'd rather see that than a set of ugly macros that just happen to be > > convenient in the short term. > > > The comments remind me one fact that these stuff are actually soc > dependent than port, because we can never run on a soc that gets > UART1 as IMX1_GPIO while UART2 as IMX2_GPIO. The fact is if we are > running on IMX1, all UART ports must be IMX1_GPIO, and if on IMX2, > all ports must be IMX2_GPIO. Based on this observation, we can > define global static variables for hwdata and hwtype and get them > set up during probe for only one port, so that your above two concerns > can be address without touch every GPIO_* lines. Here is the patch. > Please let me know what you think. Sure, if you want to do it that way. I'm personally not fond of the approach, but I don't see anything dangerous with it other than it will require a refactoring of the driver if the assumption above ever proves to be untrue on a future device. I won't nack the patch over it though. g. > > ---8<----------- > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > index 2f6a81b..19a173c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > @@ -27,9 +27,29 @@ > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> > -#include <mach/hardware.h> > #include <asm-generic/bug.h> > > +enum mxc_gpio_hwtype { > + IMX1_GPIO, > + IMX2_GPIO, > + IMX_GPIO, > +}; > + > +/* device type dependent stuff */ > +struct mxc_gpio_hwdata { > + unsigned dr_reg; > + unsigned gdir_reg; > + unsigned psr_reg; > + unsigned icr1_reg; > + unsigned icr2_reg; > + unsigned imr_reg; > + unsigned isr_reg; > + unsigned low_level; > + unsigned high_level; > + unsigned rise_edge; > + unsigned fall_edge; > +}; > + > struct mxc_gpio_port { > struct list_head node; > void __iomem *base; > @@ -40,6 +60,72 @@ struct mxc_gpio_port { > u32 both_edges; > }; > > +static struct mxc_gpio_hwdata imx1_imx2_gpio_hwdata = { > + .dr_reg = 0x1c, > + .gdir_reg = 0x00, > + .psr_reg = 0x24, > + .icr1_reg = 0x28, > + .icr2_reg = 0x2c, > + .imr_reg = 0x30, > + .isr_reg = 0x34, > + .low_level = 0x03, > + .high_level = 0x02, > + .rise_edge = 0x00, > + .fall_edge = 0x01, > +}; > + > +static struct mxc_gpio_hwdata imx_gpio_hwdata = { > + .dr_reg = 0x00, > + .gdir_reg = 0x04, > + .psr_reg = 0x08, > + .icr1_reg = 0x0c, > + .icr2_reg = 0x10, > + .imr_reg = 0x14, > + .isr_reg = 0x18, > + .low_level = 0x00, > + .high_level = 0x01, > + .rise_edge = 0x02, > + .fall_edge = 0x03, > +}; > + > +static enum mxc_gpio_hwtype mxs_gpio_hwtype; > +static struct mxc_gpio_hwdata *mxc_gpio_hwdata; > + > +#define GPIO_DR (mxc_gpio_hwdata->dr_reg) > +#define GPIO_GDIR (mxc_gpio_hwdata->gdir_reg) > +#define GPIO_PSR (mxc_gpio_hwdata->psr_reg) > +#define GPIO_ICR1 (mxc_gpio_hwdata->icr1_reg) > +#define GPIO_ICR2 (mxc_gpio_hwdata->icr2_reg) > +#define GPIO_IMR (mxc_gpio_hwdata->imr_reg) > +#define GPIO_ISR (mxc_gpio_hwdata->isr_reg) > + > +#define GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV (mxc_gpio_hwdata->low_level) > +#define GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV (mxc_gpio_hwdata->high_level) > +#define GPIO_INT_RISE_EDGE (mxc_gpio_hwdata->rise_edge) > +#define GPIO_INT_FALL_EDGE (mxc_gpio_hwdata->fall_edge) > +#define GPIO_INT_NONE 0x4 > + > +static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { > + { > + .name = "imx1-gpio", > + .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, > + }, { > + .name = "imx21-gpio", > + .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, > + }, { > + .name = "imx25-gpio", > + .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > + }, { > + .name = "imx27-gpio", > + .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, > + }, { > + .name = "imx-gpio", > + .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > + }, { > + /* sentinel */ > + } > +}; > + > /* > * MX2 has one interrupt *for all* gpio ports. The list is used > * to save the references to all ports, so that mx2_gpio_irq_handler > @@ -47,22 +133,6 @@ struct mxc_gpio_port { > */ > static LIST_HEAD(mxc_gpio_ports); > > -#define cpu_is_mx1_mx2() (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx2()) > - > -#define GPIO_DR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x1c : 0x00) > -#define GPIO_GDIR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x00 : 0x04) > -#define GPIO_PSR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x24 : 0x08) > -#define GPIO_ICR1 (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x28 : 0x0C) > -#define GPIO_ICR2 (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x2C : 0x10) > -#define GPIO_IMR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x30 : 0x14) > -#define GPIO_ISR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x34 : 0x18) > - > -#define GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x3 : 0x0) > -#define GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x2 : 0x1) > -#define GPIO_INT_RISE_EDGE (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x0 : 0x2) > -#define GPIO_INT_FALL_EDGE (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x1 : 0x3) > -#define GPIO_INT_NONE 0x4 > - > /* Note: This driver assumes 32 GPIOs are handled in one register */ > > static int gpio_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type) > @@ -236,12 +306,27 @@ static void __init mxc_gpio_init_gc(struct mxc_gpio_port *port) > IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0); > } > > +static void __devinit mxc_gpio_get_hw(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + if (mxc_gpio_hwdata) > + return; > + > + mxs_gpio_hwtype = pdev->id_entry->driver_data; > + > + if (mxs_gpio_hwtype == IMX1_GPIO || mxs_gpio_hwtype == IMX2_GPIO) > + mxc_gpio_hwdata = &imx1_imx2_gpio_hwdata; > + else > + mxc_gpio_hwdata = &imx_gpio_hwdata; > +} > + > static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct mxc_gpio_port *port; > struct resource *iores; > int err; > > + mxc_gpio_get_hw(pdev); > + > port = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mxc_gpio_port), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!port) > return -ENOMEM; > @@ -280,7 +365,7 @@ static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > /* gpio-mxc can be a generic irq chip */ > mxc_gpio_init_gc(port); > > - if (cpu_is_mx2()) { > + if (mxs_gpio_hwtype == IMX2_GPIO) { > /* setup one handler for all GPIO interrupts */ > if (pdev->id == 0) > irq_set_chained_handler(port->irq, > @@ -332,6 +417,7 @@ static struct platform_driver mxc_gpio_driver = { > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > }, > .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, > + .id_table = mxc_gpio_devtype, > }; > > static int __init gpio_mxc_init(void) > -- > 1.7.4.1 > -- > Regards, > Shawn > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-03 8:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 6:10 ` Grant Likely @ 2011-07-04 6:46 ` Sascha Hauer 2011-07-04 9:28 ` Shawn Guo 1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Sascha Hauer @ 2011-07-04 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 04:16:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > The patch removes all the uses of cpu_is_mx(). Instead, it utilizes > platform_device_id to distinguish the gpio differences among SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> > --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c | 8 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c | 12 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c | 8 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c | 12 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c | 6 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c | 6 +- > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c | 12 +- > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c | 22 ++-- > arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c | 4 +- > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > 11 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) Summarizing the renames up: i.MX1 -> imx1-gpio i.MX21 -> imx2-gpio i.MX25 -> imx-gpio i.MX27 -> imx2-gpio i.MX31 -> imx-gpio i.MX35 -> imx-gpio i.MX50 -> imx-gpio i.MX51 -> imx-gpio i.MX53 -> imx-gpio This is not consitent. Please either use the full SoC name for all device ids or use something like imx-gpio-v1, v2... It's not good that the i.MX25 is not a imx2 and that the 'modern' i.MXs only have imx-gpio. We all know that your hardware designers will be creative enough to change the register layout again in the future. Sascha > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c > index f2a6566..2bded59 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c > @@ -50,12 +50,12 @@ void __init mx1_init_irq(void) > > void __init imx1_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX1_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 0, MX1_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTA, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX1_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 1, MX1_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTB, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX1_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 2, MX1_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTC, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX1_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > + mxc_register_gpio("imx1-gpio", 3, MX1_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, > MX1_GPIO_INT_PORTD, 0); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c > index 4f32a8a..d02e20d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c > @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ void __init mx21_init_irq(void) > > void __init imx21_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX21_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX21_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX21_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX21_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX21_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX21_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 0, MX21_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 1, MX21_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 2, MX21_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 3, MX21_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 4, MX21_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 5, MX21_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX21_INT_GPIO, 0); > > imx_add_imx_dma(); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > index 1e0c956..bbe93a5 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > @@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx25_sdma_pdata __initdata = { > > void __init imx25_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); > > imx_add_imx_sdma(MX25_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX25_INT_SDMA, &imx25_sdma_pdata); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > index 944e02d..5a62969 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ void __init mx27_init_irq(void) > > void __init imx27_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx2-gpio", 5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > imx_add_imx_dma(); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c > index a1ff96f..7017c4a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c > @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ void __init imx31_soc_init(void) > { > int to_version = mx31_revision() >> 4; > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX31_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO1, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX31_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO2, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX31_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO3, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX31_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO1, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX31_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO2, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX31_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX31_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > if (to_version == 1) { > strncpy(imx31_sdma_pdata.fw_name, "sdma-imx31-to1.bin", > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > index da530ca..568a5c6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ void __init imx35_soc_init(void) > { > int to_version = mx35_revision() >> 4; > > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > if (to_version == 1) { > strncpy(imx35_sdma_pdata.fw_name, "sdma-imx35-to1.bin", > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > index 28c3f60..39e4a17 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > @@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ void __init mx50_init_irq(void) > > void __init imx50_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > index 1b7059f..1444140 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > @@ -142,23 +142,23 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx53_sdma_pdata __initdata = { > > void __init imx51_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > imx_add_imx_sdma(MX51_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX51_INT_SDMA, &imx51_sdma_pdata); > } > > void __init imx53_soc_init(void) > { > - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > - mxc_register_gpio(6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > + mxc_register_gpio("imx-gpio", 6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); > > imx_add_imx_sdma(MX53_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX53_INT_SDMA, &imx53_sdma_pdata); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c > index cf1b7fd..a7919a2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ > */ > #include <mach/devices-common.h> > > -struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(int id, > +struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(char *name, int id, > resource_size_t iobase, resource_size_t iosize, int irq, int irq_high) > { > struct resource res[] = { > @@ -28,5 +28,5 @@ struct platform_device *__init mxc_register_gpio(int id, > }; > > return platform_device_register_resndata(&mxc_aips_bus, > - "gpio-mxc", id, res, ARRAY_SIZE(res), NULL, 0); > + name, id, res, ARRAY_SIZE(res), NULL, 0); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h > index 91fa263..4e3d978 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h > @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ extern int mx51_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc, > unsigned long ckih1, unsigned long ckih2); > extern int mx53_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc, > unsigned long ckih1, unsigned long ckih2); > -extern struct platform_device *mxc_register_gpio(int id, > +extern struct platform_device *mxc_register_gpio(char *name, int id, > resource_size_t iobase, resource_size_t iosize, int irq, int irq_high); > extern int mxc_register_device(struct platform_device *pdev, void *data); > extern void mxc_set_cpu_type(unsigned int type); > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > index 2f6a81b..7ae71d6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > @@ -27,9 +27,34 @@ > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> > -#include <mach/hardware.h> > #include <asm-generic/bug.h> > > +enum mxc_gpio_type { > + IMX1_GPIO, > + IMX2_GPIO, > + IMX_GPIO, > +}; > + > +/* device type dependent stuff */ > +struct mxc_gpio_hwdata { > + unsigned dr_reg; > + unsigned gdir_reg; > + unsigned psr_reg; > + unsigned icr1_reg; > + unsigned icr2_reg; > + unsigned imr_reg; > + unsigned isr_reg; > + unsigned low_level; > + unsigned high_level; > + unsigned rise_edge; > + unsigned fall_edge; > +}; > + > +struct mxc_gpio_data { > + struct mxc_gpio_hwdata *hwdata; > + enum mxc_gpio_type devtype; > +}; > + > struct mxc_gpio_port { > struct list_head node; > void __iomem *base; > @@ -38,6 +63,82 @@ struct mxc_gpio_port { > int virtual_irq_start; > struct bgpio_chip bgc; > u32 both_edges; > + struct mxc_gpio_data *devdata; > +}; > + > +#define IS_IMX2_GPIO() (port->devdata->devtype == IMX2_GPIO) > + > +#define GPIO_DR (port->devdata->hwdata->dr_reg) > +#define GPIO_GDIR (port->devdata->hwdata->gdir_reg) > +#define GPIO_PSR (port->devdata->hwdata->psr_reg) > +#define GPIO_ICR1 (port->devdata->hwdata->icr1_reg) > +#define GPIO_ICR2 (port->devdata->hwdata->icr2_reg) > +#define GPIO_IMR (port->devdata->hwdata->imr_reg) > +#define GPIO_ISR (port->devdata->hwdata->isr_reg) > + > +#define GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV (port->devdata->hwdata->low_level) > +#define GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV (port->devdata->hwdata->high_level) > +#define GPIO_INT_RISE_EDGE (port->devdata->hwdata->rise_edge) > +#define GPIO_INT_FALL_EDGE (port->devdata->hwdata->fall_edge) > +#define GPIO_INT_NONE 0x4 > + > +static struct mxc_gpio_hwdata mxc_gpio_hwdata[] = { > + [0] = { > + .dr_reg = 0x1c, > + .gdir_reg = 0x00, > + .psr_reg = 0x24, > + .icr1_reg = 0x28, > + .icr2_reg = 0x2c, > + .imr_reg = 0x30, > + .isr_reg = 0x34, > + .low_level = 0x03, > + .high_level = 0x02, > + .rise_edge = 0x00, > + .fall_edge = 0x01, > + }, > + [1] = { > + .dr_reg = 0x00, > + .gdir_reg = 0x04, > + .psr_reg = 0x08, > + .icr1_reg = 0x0c, > + .icr2_reg = 0x10, > + .imr_reg = 0x14, > + .isr_reg = 0x18, > + .low_level = 0x00, > + .high_level = 0x01, > + .rise_edge = 0x02, > + .fall_edge = 0x03, > + }, > +}; > + > +static struct mxc_gpio_data mxc_gpio_devdata[] = { > + [IMX1_GPIO] = { > + .hwdata = &mxc_gpio_hwdata[0], > + .devtype = IMX1_GPIO, > + }, > + [IMX2_GPIO] = { > + .hwdata = &mxc_gpio_hwdata[0], > + .devtype = IMX2_GPIO, > + }, > + [IMX_GPIO] = { > + .hwdata = &mxc_gpio_hwdata[1], > + .devtype = IMX_GPIO, > + }, > +}; > + > +static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { > + { > + .name = "imx1-gpio", > + .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, > + }, { > + .name = "imx2-gpio", > + .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, > + }, { > + .name = "imx-gpio", > + .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > + }, { > + /* sentinel */ > + } > }; > > /* > @@ -47,22 +148,6 @@ struct mxc_gpio_port { > */ > static LIST_HEAD(mxc_gpio_ports); > > -#define cpu_is_mx1_mx2() (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx2()) > - > -#define GPIO_DR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x1c : 0x00) > -#define GPIO_GDIR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x00 : 0x04) > -#define GPIO_PSR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x24 : 0x08) > -#define GPIO_ICR1 (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x28 : 0x0C) > -#define GPIO_ICR2 (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x2C : 0x10) > -#define GPIO_IMR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x30 : 0x14) > -#define GPIO_ISR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x34 : 0x18) > - > -#define GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x3 : 0x0) > -#define GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x2 : 0x1) > -#define GPIO_INT_RISE_EDGE (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x0 : 0x2) > -#define GPIO_INT_FALL_EDGE (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x1 : 0x3) > -#define GPIO_INT_NONE 0x4 > - > /* Note: This driver assumes 32 GPIOs are handled in one register */ > > static int gpio_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type) > @@ -246,6 +331,7 @@ static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (!port) > return -ENOMEM; > > + port->devdata = &mxc_gpio_devdata[pdev->id_entry->driver_data]; > port->virtual_irq_start = MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START + pdev->id * 32; > > iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > @@ -280,7 +366,7 @@ static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > /* gpio-mxc can be a generic irq chip */ > mxc_gpio_init_gc(port); > > - if (cpu_is_mx2()) { > + if (IS_IMX2_GPIO()) { > /* setup one handler for all GPIO interrupts */ > if (pdev->id == 0) > irq_set_chained_handler(port->irq, > @@ -332,6 +418,7 @@ static struct platform_driver mxc_gpio_driver = { > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > }, > .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, > + .id_table = mxc_gpio_devtype, > }; > > static int __init gpio_mxc_init(void) > -- > 1.7.4.1 > > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-04 6:46 ` Sascha Hauer @ 2011-07-04 9:28 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 9:49 ` Sascha Hauer 2011-07-04 15:23 ` Grant Likely 0 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-04 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:46:03AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 04:16:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > The patch removes all the uses of cpu_is_mx(). Instead, it utilizes > > platform_device_id to distinguish the gpio differences among SoCs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c | 8 +- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c | 12 +- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c | 8 +- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c | 12 +- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c | 6 +- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c | 6 +- > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c | 12 +- > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c | 22 ++-- > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c | 4 +- > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 2 +- > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > > 11 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > > > Summarizing the renames up: > > i.MX1 -> imx1-gpio > i.MX21 -> imx2-gpio > i.MX25 -> imx-gpio > i.MX27 -> imx2-gpio > i.MX31 -> imx-gpio > i.MX35 -> imx-gpio > i.MX50 -> imx-gpio > i.MX51 -> imx-gpio > i.MX53 -> imx-gpio > > This is not consitent. Please either use the full SoC name for all > device ids or use something like imx-gpio-v1, v2... > It's not good that the i.MX25 is not a imx2 and that the 'modern' > i.MXs only have imx-gpio. We all know that your hardware designers > will be creative enough to change the register layout again in the > future. > Ok, here it is. It's avoid confusion in machine code, but every time we add a new soc we need to change touch this table, even if the new soc has a total compatible gpio to IMX_GPIO. I'm fine with either way. static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { { .name = "imx1-gpio", .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx21-gpio", .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx25-gpio", .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx27-gpio", .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx31-gpio", .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx35-gpio", .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx50-gpio", .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx51-gpio", .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx53-gpio", .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, }, { /* sentinel */ } }; -- Regards, Shawn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-04 9:28 ` Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-04 9:49 ` Sascha Hauer 2011-07-04 10:20 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 15:23 ` Grant Likely 1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Sascha Hauer @ 2011-07-04 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 05:28:01PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:46:03AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 04:16:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > The patch removes all the uses of cpu_is_mx(). Instead, it utilizes > > > platform_device_id to distinguish the gpio differences among SoCs. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> > > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c | 8 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c | 12 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c | 8 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c | 12 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c | 6 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c | 6 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c | 12 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c | 22 ++-- > > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c | 4 +- > > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 2 +- > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > 11 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > > > > > > Summarizing the renames up: > > > > i.MX1 -> imx1-gpio > > i.MX21 -> imx2-gpio > > i.MX25 -> imx-gpio > > i.MX27 -> imx2-gpio > > i.MX31 -> imx-gpio > > i.MX35 -> imx-gpio > > i.MX50 -> imx-gpio > > i.MX51 -> imx-gpio > > i.MX53 -> imx-gpio > > > > This is not consitent. Please either use the full SoC name for all > > device ids or use something like imx-gpio-v1, v2... > > It's not good that the i.MX25 is not a imx2 and that the 'modern' > > i.MXs only have imx-gpio. We all know that your hardware designers > > will be creative enough to change the register layout again in the > > future. > > > Ok, here it is. It's avoid confusion in machine code, but every > time we add a new soc we need to change touch this table, even if > the new soc has a total compatible gpio to IMX_GPIO. I'm fine with > either way. I'm also fine with imx1-gpio, imx21-gpio and imx31-gpio and all others get a compatible entry with these like you did in the uart driver. I only want to avoid to have a imx2-gpio when a i.MX25 is incompatible with this. When we do so it's probably worth to put this into a comment somewhere next to the id table. I can imagine people wonder why only such ancient SoCs are supported. Sascha > > static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { > { > .name = "imx1-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx21-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx25-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx27-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx31-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx35-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx50-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx51-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx53-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > /* sentinel */ > } > }; > > -- > Regards, > Shawn > > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-04 9:49 ` Sascha Hauer @ 2011-07-04 10:20 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 16:44 ` Sascha Hauer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-04 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:49:21AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 05:28:01PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:46:03AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 04:16:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > > The patch removes all the uses of cpu_is_mx(). Instead, it utilizes > > > > platform_device_id to distinguish the gpio differences among SoCs. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > > > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> > > > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> > > > > --- > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c | 8 +- > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c | 12 +- > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c | 8 +- > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c | 12 +- > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c | 6 +- > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c | 6 +- > > > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c | 12 +- > > > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c | 22 ++-- > > > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c | 4 +- > > > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 2 +- > > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > > 11 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > Summarizing the renames up: > > > > > > i.MX1 -> imx1-gpio > > > i.MX21 -> imx2-gpio > > > i.MX25 -> imx-gpio > > > i.MX27 -> imx2-gpio > > > i.MX31 -> imx-gpio > > > i.MX35 -> imx-gpio > > > i.MX50 -> imx-gpio > > > i.MX51 -> imx-gpio > > > i.MX53 -> imx-gpio > > > > > > This is not consitent. Please either use the full SoC name for all > > > device ids or use something like imx-gpio-v1, v2... > > > It's not good that the i.MX25 is not a imx2 and that the 'modern' > > > i.MXs only have imx-gpio. We all know that your hardware designers > > > will be creative enough to change the register layout again in the > > > future. > > > > > Ok, here it is. It's avoid confusion in machine code, but every > > time we add a new soc we need to change touch this table, even if > > the new soc has a total compatible gpio to IMX_GPIO. I'm fine with > > either way. > > I'm also fine with imx1-gpio, imx21-gpio and imx31-gpio and all others > get a compatible entry with these like you did in the uart driver. > I only want to avoid to have a imx2-gpio when a i.MX25 is incompatible > with this. > When we do so it's probably worth to put this into a comment somewhere > next to the id table. I can imagine people wonder why only such ancient > SoCs are supported. > So I'm going to do the following to address your concern. Please let me know if you still do not buy it. static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { { .name = "imx1-gpio", .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx21-gpio", .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx25-gpio", .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx27-gpio", .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx-gpio", .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, }, { /* sentinel */ } }; -- Regards, Shawn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-04 10:20 ` Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-04 16:44 ` Sascha Hauer 2011-07-05 3:01 ` Shawn Guo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Sascha Hauer @ 2011-07-04 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:20:09PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:49:21AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 05:28:01PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:46:03AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 04:16:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > > > The patch removes all the uses of cpu_is_mx(). Instead, it utilizes > > > > > platform_device_id to distinguish the gpio differences among SoCs. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > > > > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> > > > > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> > > > > > --- > > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c | 8 +- > > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c | 12 +- > > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c | 8 +- > > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c | 12 +- > > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c | 6 +- > > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c | 6 +- > > > > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c | 12 +- > > > > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c | 22 ++-- > > > > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c | 4 +- > > > > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 2 +- > > > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > > > 11 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > Summarizing the renames up: > > > > > > > > i.MX1 -> imx1-gpio > > > > i.MX21 -> imx2-gpio > > > > i.MX25 -> imx-gpio > > > > i.MX27 -> imx2-gpio > > > > i.MX31 -> imx-gpio > > > > i.MX35 -> imx-gpio > > > > i.MX50 -> imx-gpio > > > > i.MX51 -> imx-gpio > > > > i.MX53 -> imx-gpio > > > > > > > > This is not consitent. Please either use the full SoC name for all > > > > device ids or use something like imx-gpio-v1, v2... > > > > It's not good that the i.MX25 is not a imx2 and that the 'modern' > > > > i.MXs only have imx-gpio. We all know that your hardware designers > > > > will be creative enough to change the register layout again in the > > > > future. > > > > > > > Ok, here it is. It's avoid confusion in machine code, but every > > > time we add a new soc we need to change touch this table, even if > > > the new soc has a total compatible gpio to IMX_GPIO. I'm fine with > > > either way. > > > > I'm also fine with imx1-gpio, imx21-gpio and imx31-gpio and all others > > get a compatible entry with these like you did in the uart driver. > > I only want to avoid to have a imx2-gpio when a i.MX25 is incompatible > > with this. > > When we do so it's probably worth to put this into a comment somewhere > > next to the id table. I can imagine people wonder why only such ancient > > SoCs are supported. > > > So I'm going to do the following to address your concern. Please let > me know if you still do not buy it. > > static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { > { > .name = "imx1-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx21-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx25-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx27-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > /* sentinel */ > } > }; Read again. We have three different types of gpio irq controllers, they are first seen in the imx1, imx21 and imx31. So all others can be made compatible with these three. No need for imx-gpio, imx25-gpio and imx27-gpio. The mxc_gpio_devtype would look like this: static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { { .name = "imx1-gpio", .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx21-gpio", .driver_data = IMX21_GPIO, }, { .name = "imx31-gpio", .driver_data = IMX31_GPIO, }, { } }; Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-04 16:44 ` Sascha Hauer @ 2011-07-05 3:01 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-05 3:04 ` Grant Likely 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-05 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:44:57PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:20:09PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:49:21AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 05:28:01PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:46:03AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 04:16:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > > > > The patch removes all the uses of cpu_is_mx(). Instead, it utilizes > > > > > > platform_device_id to distinguish the gpio differences among SoCs. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > > > > > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> > > > > > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c | 8 +- > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c | 12 +- > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c | 8 +- > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c | 12 +- > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c | 6 +- > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c | 6 +- > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c | 12 +- > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c | 22 ++-- > > > > > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c | 4 +- > > > > > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 2 +- > > > > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > > > > 11 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Summarizing the renames up: > > > > > > > > > > i.MX1 -> imx1-gpio > > > > > i.MX21 -> imx2-gpio > > > > > i.MX25 -> imx-gpio > > > > > i.MX27 -> imx2-gpio > > > > > i.MX31 -> imx-gpio > > > > > i.MX35 -> imx-gpio > > > > > i.MX50 -> imx-gpio > > > > > i.MX51 -> imx-gpio > > > > > i.MX53 -> imx-gpio > > > > > > > > > > This is not consitent. Please either use the full SoC name for all > > > > > device ids or use something like imx-gpio-v1, v2... > > > > > It's not good that the i.MX25 is not a imx2 and that the 'modern' > > > > > i.MXs only have imx-gpio. We all know that your hardware designers > > > > > will be creative enough to change the register layout again in the > > > > > future. > > > > > > > > > Ok, here it is. It's avoid confusion in machine code, but every > > > > time we add a new soc we need to change touch this table, even if > > > > the new soc has a total compatible gpio to IMX_GPIO. I'm fine with > > > > either way. > > > > > > I'm also fine with imx1-gpio, imx21-gpio and imx31-gpio and all others > > > get a compatible entry with these like you did in the uart driver. > > > I only want to avoid to have a imx2-gpio when a i.MX25 is incompatible > > > with this. > > > When we do so it's probably worth to put this into a comment somewhere > > > next to the id table. I can imagine people wonder why only such ancient > > > SoCs are supported. > > > > > So I'm going to do the following to address your concern. Please let > > me know if you still do not buy it. > > > > static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { > > { > > .name = "imx1-gpio", > > .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, > > }, { > > .name = "imx21-gpio", > > .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, > > }, { > > .name = "imx25-gpio", > > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > > }, { > > .name = "imx27-gpio", > > .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, > > }, { > > .name = "imx-gpio", > > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > > }, { > > /* sentinel */ > > } > > }; > > Read again. We have three different types of gpio irq controllers, they > are first seen in the imx1, imx21 and imx31. So all others can be made > compatible with these three. No need for imx-gpio, imx25-gpio and > imx27-gpio. The mxc_gpio_devtype would look like this: > > static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { > { > .name = "imx1-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx21-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX21_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx31-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX31_GPIO, > }, { > } > }; > This is really what I want to do with dt match table. But before we totally remove platform device probe and switch it over to dt, I'm unsure we want to do this. It will require the following changes on platform device code registration right now. I guess this is something you do not want, right? diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c index 1e0c956..ba3009e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c @@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx25_sdma_pdata __initdata = { void __init imx25_soc_init(void) { - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); imx_add_imx_sdma(MX25_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX25_INT_SDMA, &imx25_sdma_pdata); } diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c index 944e02d..81a7870 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ void __init mx27_init_irq(void) void __init imx27_soc_init(void) { - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); imx_add_imx_dma(); } diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c index da530ca..8b98205 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ void __init imx35_soc_init(void) { int to_version = mx35_revision() >> 4; - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); if (to_version == 1) { strncpy(imx35_sdma_pdata.fw_name, "sdma-imx35-to1.bin", diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c index 28c3f60..5c20b33 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c @@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ void __init mx50_init_irq(void) void __init imx50_soc_init(void) { - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); } diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c index 1b7059f..82ad5be 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c @@ -142,23 +142,23 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx53_sdma_pdata __initdata = { void __init imx51_soc_init(void) { - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); imx_add_imx_sdma(MX51_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX51_INT_SDMA, &imx51_sdma_pdata); } void __init imx53_soc_init(void) { - mxc_register_gpio(0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); - mxc_register_gpio(6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); + mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); imx_add_imx_sdma(MX53_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX53_INT_SDMA, &imx53_sdma_pdata); } -- Regards, Shawn ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-05 3:01 ` Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-05 3:04 ` Grant Likely 2011-07-05 3:32 ` Shawn Guo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2011-07-05 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:44:57PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: >> Read again. We have three different types of gpio irq controllers, they >> are first seen in the imx1, imx21 and imx31. So all others can be made >> compatible with these three. No need for imx-gpio, imx25-gpio and >> imx27-gpio. The mxc_gpio_devtype would look like this: >> >> static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { >> ? ? ? { >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name = "imx1-gpio", >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, >> ? ? ? }, { >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name = "imx21-gpio", >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .driver_data = IMX21_GPIO, >> ? ? ? }, { >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name = "imx31-gpio", >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .driver_data = IMX31_GPIO, >> ? ? ? }, { >> ? ? ? } >> }; >> > This is really what I want to do with dt match table. ?But before we > totally remove platform device probe and switch it over to dt, I'm > unsure we want to do this. ?It will require the following changes on > platform device code registration right now. ?I guess this is > something you do not want, right? What is the problem with the below changes? I see no issue with changing the static platform_device registrations in this way. g. > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > index 1e0c956..ba3009e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > @@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx25_sdma_pdata __initdata = { > > ?void __init imx25_soc_init(void) > ?{ > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); > > ? ? ? ?imx_add_imx_sdma(MX25_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX25_INT_SDMA, &imx25_sdma_pdata); > ?} > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > index 944e02d..81a7870 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ void __init mx27_init_irq(void) > > ?void __init imx27_soc_init(void) > ?{ > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > ? ? ? ?imx_add_imx_dma(); > ?} > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > index da530ca..8b98205 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ void __init imx35_soc_init(void) > ?{ > ? ? ? ?int to_version = mx35_revision() >> 4; > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > ? ? ? ?if (to_version == 1) { > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?strncpy(imx35_sdma_pdata.fw_name, "sdma-imx35-to1.bin", > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > index 28c3f60..5c20b33 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > @@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ void __init mx50_init_irq(void) > > ?void __init imx50_soc_init(void) > ?{ > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > ?} > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > index 1b7059f..82ad5be 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > @@ -142,23 +142,23 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx53_sdma_pdata __initdata = { > > ?void __init imx51_soc_init(void) > ?{ > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > ? ? ? ?imx_add_imx_sdma(MX51_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX51_INT_SDMA, &imx51_sdma_pdata); > ?} > > ?void __init imx53_soc_init(void) > ?{ > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); > > ? ? ? ?imx_add_imx_sdma(MX53_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX53_INT_SDMA, &imx53_sdma_pdata); > ?} > > -- > Regards, > Shawn > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-05 3:04 ` Grant Likely @ 2011-07-05 3:32 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-05 16:42 ` Sascha Hauer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-05 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:04:55PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:44:57PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > >> Read again. We have three different types of gpio irq controllers, they > >> are first seen in the imx1, imx21 and imx31. So all others can be made > >> compatible with these three. No need for imx-gpio, imx25-gpio and > >> imx27-gpio. The mxc_gpio_devtype would look like this: > >> > >> static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { > >> ? ? ? { > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name = "imx1-gpio", > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, > >> ? ? ? }, { > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name = "imx21-gpio", > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .driver_data = IMX21_GPIO, > >> ? ? ? }, { > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name = "imx31-gpio", > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .driver_data = IMX31_GPIO, > >> ? ? ? }, { > >> ? ? ? } > >> }; > >> > > This is really what I want to do with dt match table. ?But before we > > totally remove platform device probe and switch it over to dt, I'm > > unsure we want to do this. ?It will require the following changes on > > platform device code registration right now. ?I guess this is > > something you do not want, right? > > What is the problem with the below changes? I see no issue with > changing the static platform_device registrations in this way. > We end up to register "imx21-gpio" in imx27_soc_init, and "imx31-gpio" in imx25/35/50/51/53 per-soc-init function. The may confuse people who only look at platform device registration code. This is something may concern Sascha. Let's see what he thinks. -- Regards, Shawn > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > > index 1e0c956..ba3009e 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c > > @@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx25_sdma_pdata __initdata = { > > > > ?void __init imx25_soc_init(void) > > ?{ > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX25_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX25_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX25_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 3, MX25_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX25_INT_GPIO4, 0); > > > > ? ? ? ?imx_add_imx_sdma(MX25_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX25_INT_SDMA, &imx25_sdma_pdata); > > ?} > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > > index 944e02d..81a7870 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c > > @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ void __init mx27_init_irq(void) > > > > ?void __init imx27_soc_init(void) > > ?{ > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 0, MX27_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 1, MX27_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 2, MX27_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 3, MX27_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 4, MX27_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx21-gpio", 5, MX27_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256, MX27_INT_GPIO, 0); > > > > ? ? ? ?imx_add_imx_dma(); > > ?} > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > > index da530ca..8b98205 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c > > @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ void __init imx35_soc_init(void) > > ?{ > > ? ? ? ?int to_version = mx35_revision() >> 4; > > > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX35_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO1, 0); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX35_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO2, 0); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX35_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX35_INT_GPIO3, 0); > > > > ? ? ? ?if (to_version == 1) { > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?strncpy(imx35_sdma_pdata.fw_name, "sdma-imx35-to1.bin", > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > > index 28c3f60..5c20b33 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c > > @@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ void __init mx50_init_irq(void) > > > > ?void __init imx50_soc_init(void) > > ?{ > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX50_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX50_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX50_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 3, MX50_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 4, MX50_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 5, MX50_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX50_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX50_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > > ?} > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > > index 1b7059f..82ad5be 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c > > @@ -142,23 +142,23 @@ static struct sdma_platform_data imx53_sdma_pdata __initdata = { > > > > ?void __init imx51_soc_init(void) > > ?{ > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 3, MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > > > ? ? ? ?imx_add_imx_sdma(MX51_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX51_INT_SDMA, &imx51_sdma_pdata); > > ?} > > > > ?void __init imx53_soc_init(void) > > ?{ > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > > - ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio(6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 0, MX53_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO1_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO1_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 1, MX53_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO2_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO2_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 2, MX53_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO3_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO3_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 3, MX53_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO4_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO4_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 4, MX53_GPIO5_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO5_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO5_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 5, MX53_GPIO6_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO6_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO6_HIGH); > > + ? ? ? mxc_register_gpio("imx31-gpio", 6, MX53_GPIO7_BASE_ADDR, SZ_16K, MX53_INT_GPIO7_LOW, MX53_INT_GPIO7_HIGH); > > > > ? ? ? ?imx_add_imx_sdma(MX53_SDMA_BASE_ADDR, MX53_INT_SDMA, &imx53_sdma_pdata); > > ?} > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-05 3:32 ` Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-05 16:42 ` Sascha Hauer 2011-07-06 5:21 ` Shawn Guo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Sascha Hauer @ 2011-07-05 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 11:32:28AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:04:55PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:44:57PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > >> Read again. We have three different types of gpio irq controllers, they > > >> are first seen in the imx1, imx21 and imx31. So all others can be made > > >> compatible with these three. No need for imx-gpio, imx25-gpio and > > >> imx27-gpio. The mxc_gpio_devtype would look like this: > > >> > > >> static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { > > >> ? ? ? { > > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name = "imx1-gpio", > > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, > > >> ? ? ? }, { > > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name = "imx21-gpio", > > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .driver_data = IMX21_GPIO, > > >> ? ? ? }, { > > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name = "imx31-gpio", > > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .driver_data = IMX31_GPIO, > > >> ? ? ? }, { > > >> ? ? ? } > > >> }; > > >> > > > This is really what I want to do with dt match table. ?But before we > > > totally remove platform device probe and switch it over to dt, I'm > > > unsure we want to do this. ?It will require the following changes on > > > platform device code registration right now. ?I guess this is > > > something you do not want, right? > > > > What is the problem with the below changes? I see no issue with > > changing the static platform_device registrations in this way. > > > We end up to register "imx21-gpio" in imx27_soc_init, and "imx31-gpio" > in imx25/35/50/51/53 per-soc-init function. The may confuse people > who only look at platform device registration code. This is something > may concern Sascha. Let's see what he thinks. If we vote for doing this in the device tree then I see no problem doing so in the platform registration code aswell. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-05 16:42 ` Sascha Hauer @ 2011-07-06 5:21 ` Shawn Guo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-06 5:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 06:42:38PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 11:32:28AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:04:55PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:44:57PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > >> Read again. We have three different types of gpio irq controllers, they > > > >> are first seen in the imx1, imx21 and imx31. So all others can be made > > > >> compatible with these three. No need for imx-gpio, imx25-gpio and > > > >> imx27-gpio. The mxc_gpio_devtype would look like this: > > > >> > > > >> static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { > > > >> ? ? ? { > > > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name = "imx1-gpio", > > > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, > > > >> ? ? ? }, { > > > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name = "imx21-gpio", > > > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .driver_data = IMX21_GPIO, > > > >> ? ? ? }, { > > > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name = "imx31-gpio", > > > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .driver_data = IMX31_GPIO, > > > >> ? ? ? }, { > > > >> ? ? ? } > > > >> }; > > > >> > > > > This is really what I want to do with dt match table. ?But before we > > > > totally remove platform device probe and switch it over to dt, I'm > > > > unsure we want to do this. ?It will require the following changes on > > > > platform device code registration right now. ?I guess this is > > > > something you do not want, right? > > > > > > What is the problem with the below changes? I see no issue with > > > changing the static platform_device registrations in this way. > > > > > We end up to register "imx21-gpio" in imx27_soc_init, and "imx31-gpio" > > in imx25/35/50/51/53 per-soc-init function. The may confuse people > > who only look at platform device registration code. This is something > > may concern Sascha. Let's see what he thinks. > > If we vote for doing this in the device tree then I see no problem doing > so in the platform registration code aswell. > That's great. Will do so in the v3. -- Regards, Shawn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() 2011-07-04 9:28 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 9:49 ` Sascha Hauer @ 2011-07-04 15:23 ` Grant Likely 1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2011-07-04 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 05:28:01PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:46:03AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 04:16:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > The patch removes all the uses of cpu_is_mx(). Instead, it utilizes > > > platform_device_id to distinguish the gpio differences among SoCs. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> > > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c | 8 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c | 12 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c | 8 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c | 12 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c | 6 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c | 6 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c | 12 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c | 22 ++-- > > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c | 4 +- > > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 2 +- > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > 11 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > > > > > > Summarizing the renames up: > > > > i.MX1 -> imx1-gpio > > i.MX21 -> imx2-gpio > > i.MX25 -> imx-gpio > > i.MX27 -> imx2-gpio > > i.MX31 -> imx-gpio > > i.MX35 -> imx-gpio > > i.MX50 -> imx-gpio > > i.MX51 -> imx-gpio > > i.MX53 -> imx-gpio > > > > This is not consitent. Please either use the full SoC name for all > > device ids or use something like imx-gpio-v1, v2... > > It's not good that the i.MX25 is not a imx2 and that the 'modern' > > i.MXs only have imx-gpio. We all know that your hardware designers > > will be creative enough to change the register layout again in the > > future. > > > Ok, here it is. It's avoid confusion in machine code, but every > time we add a new soc we need to change touch this table, even if > the new soc has a total compatible gpio to IMX_GPIO. I'm fine with > either way. > > static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { > { > .name = "imx1-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX1_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx21-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx25-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx27-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX2_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx31-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx35-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx50-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx51-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > .name = "imx53-gpio", > .driver_data = IMX_GPIO, > }, { > /* sentinel */ > } IMNSHO, this is overkill. It is fine to identify several common types and have multiple SoCs use them, although I see Sascha's point that using imx21-gpio is very odd for the imx3 and imx5 parts. Certainly not wrong. Just odd. It's fine to be pragmatic here. Use imx-gpio for most of them, and have a special value for the special parts; imx21-gpio and imx27-gpio. This is all completely in-kernel stuff anyway so there is no need to coordinate with external data. When you build the DT table, you could lean in the direction of device families. Get the driver to match against the first iteration of 'major' uprevs of the device family, like "fsl,imx1-gpio", "fsl,imx21-gpio", "fsl,imx31-gpio", "fsl,imx50-gpio", and for the chips that don't fit the model, don't claim compatibility with the previous version. That would give you the following compatible strings in the device tree for each SoC: imx1: compatible = "fsl,imx1-gpio"; imx21: compatible = "fsl,imx21-gpio"; imx25: compatible = "fsl,imx25-gpio"; /* NOT compatible with imx21-gpio */ imx27: compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpio", "fsl,imx21-gpio"; imx31: compatible = "fsl,imx31-gpio"; imx35: compatible = "fsl,imx37-gpio", "fsl,imx31-gpio"; imx50: compatible = "fsl,imx50-gpio"; imx51: compatible = "fsl,imx51-gpio", "fsl,imx50-gpio"; imx53: compatible = "fsl,imx53-gpio", "fsl,imx50-gpio"; That said, I don't actually care much. I'm perfectly happy to accept a binding where the imx3x and 5x device trees claim compatibility with the imx1-gpio /providing/ that the imx3 and imx5 gpio controllers truly are register level compatible with the imx1 device. However, if the imx3 and 5 gpio controllers add new features, then it is probably wise to use the fsl,imx31-gpio and fsl,imx50-gpio values so that the driver can detect them generically (even if the driver doesn't yet support the extra features). g. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] gpio/mxc: add device tree probe support 2011-07-03 8:16 [PATCH 0/2] Add device tree probe for imx/mxc gpio Shawn Guo 2011-07-03 8:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-03 8:16 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 6:19 ` Grant Likely 1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-03 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel The patch adds device tree probe support for gpio-mxc driver. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> --- .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.txt | 22 ++++++++++ drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.txt diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4363ae4 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.txt @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +* Freescale i.MX/MXC GPIO controller + +Required properties: +- compatible : Should be "fsl,<soc>-gpio" +- reg : Address and length of the register set for the device +- interrupts : Should be the port interrupt shared by all 32 pins, if + one number. If two numbers, the first one is the interrupt shared + by low 16 pins and the second one is for high 16 pins. +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a gpio controller. +- #gpio-cells : Should be two. The first cell is the pin number and + the second cell is used to specify optional parameters (currently + unused). + +Example: + +gpio0: gpio at 73f84000 { + compatible = "fsl,imx51-gpio", "fsl,imx31-gpio"; + reg = <0x73f84000 0x4000>; + interrupts = <50 51>; + gpio-controller; + #gpio-cells = <2>; +}; diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c index 7ae71d6..b42204f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> #include <asm-generic/bug.h> enum mxc_gpio_type { @@ -141,6 +143,13 @@ static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { } }; +static const struct of_device_id mxc_gpio_dt_ids[] = { + { .compatible = "fsl,imx1-gpio", .data = &mxc_gpio_devdata[IMX1_GPIO], }, + { .compatible = "fsl,imx2-gpio", .data = &mxc_gpio_devdata[IMX2_GPIO], }, + { .compatible = "fsl,imx31-gpio", .data = &mxc_gpio_devdata[IMX_GPIO], }, + { /* sentinel */ }, +}; + /* * MX2 has one interrupt *for all* gpio ports. The list is used * to save the references to all ports, so that mx2_gpio_irq_handler @@ -321,6 +330,33 @@ static void __init mxc_gpio_init_gc(struct mxc_gpio_port *port) IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0); } +#ifdef CONFIG_OF +static int mxc_gpio_probe_dt(struct mxc_gpio_port *port, + struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; + const struct of_device_id *of_id = + of_match_device(mxc_gpio_dt_ids, &pdev->dev); + + if (!np) + return -ENODEV; + + pdev->id = of_alias_get_id(np, "gpio"); + if (pdev->id < 0) + return -ENODEV; + + port->devdata = of_id->data; + + return 0; +} +#else +static inline int mxc_gpio_probe_dt(struct mxc_gpio_port *port, + struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + return -ENODEV; +} +#endif + static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct mxc_gpio_port *port; @@ -331,7 +367,10 @@ static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!port) return -ENOMEM; - port->devdata = &mxc_gpio_devdata[pdev->id_entry->driver_data]; + err = mxc_gpio_probe_dt(port, pdev); + if (err == -ENODEV) + port->devdata = &mxc_gpio_devdata[pdev->id_entry->driver_data]; + port->virtual_irq_start = MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START + pdev->id * 32; iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); @@ -416,6 +455,7 @@ static struct platform_driver mxc_gpio_driver = { .driver = { .name = "gpio-mxc", .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .of_match_table = mxc_gpio_dt_ids, }, .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, .id_table = mxc_gpio_devtype, -- 1.7.4.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] gpio/mxc: add device tree probe support 2011-07-03 8:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio/mxc: add device tree probe support Shawn Guo @ 2011-07-04 6:19 ` Grant Likely 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2011-07-04 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 04:16:57PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > The patch adds device tree probe support for gpio-mxc driver. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Hi Shawn, comments below. g. > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.txt | 22 ++++++++++ > drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..4363ae4 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ > +* Freescale i.MX/MXC GPIO controller > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible : Should be "fsl,<soc>-gpio" > +- reg : Address and length of the register set for the device > +- interrupts : Should be the port interrupt shared by all 32 pins, if > + one number. If two numbers, the first one is the interrupt shared > + by low 16 pins and the second one is for high 16 pins. > +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a gpio controller. > +- #gpio-cells : Should be two. The first cell is the pin number and > + the second cell is used to specify optional parameters (currently > + unused). > + > +Example: > + > +gpio0: gpio at 73f84000 { > + compatible = "fsl,imx51-gpio", "fsl,imx31-gpio"; > + reg = <0x73f84000 0x4000>; > + interrupts = <50 51>; > + gpio-controller; > + #gpio-cells = <2>; > +}; > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > index 7ae71d6..b42204f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_device.h> > #include <asm-generic/bug.h> > > enum mxc_gpio_type { > @@ -141,6 +143,13 @@ static struct platform_device_id mxc_gpio_devtype[] = { > } > }; > > +static const struct of_device_id mxc_gpio_dt_ids[] = { > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx1-gpio", .data = &mxc_gpio_devdata[IMX1_GPIO], }, > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx2-gpio", .data = &mxc_gpio_devdata[IMX2_GPIO], }, > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx31-gpio", .data = &mxc_gpio_devdata[IMX_GPIO], }, > + { /* sentinel */ }, > +}; > + > /* > * MX2 has one interrupt *for all* gpio ports. The list is used > * to save the references to all ports, so that mx2_gpio_irq_handler > @@ -321,6 +330,33 @@ static void __init mxc_gpio_init_gc(struct mxc_gpio_port *port) > IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > +static int mxc_gpio_probe_dt(struct mxc_gpio_port *port, > + struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > + const struct of_device_id *of_id = > + of_match_device(mxc_gpio_dt_ids, &pdev->dev); > + > + if (!np) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + pdev->id = of_alias_get_id(np, "gpio"); > + if (pdev->id < 0) > + return -ENODEV; I really doubt this is wanted or needed. First, after a platform_device is registered, pdev->id is immutable. It must not be changed. Second, when using the DT, there is absolutely no need for a preset range of gpio numbers. The gpio core assigns ranges dynamically, and all GPIO references are via device tree phandles that don't use the Linux global gpio number space. The driver needs to be fixed to dynamically assign its gpio range when probed from the DT. > + > + port->devdata = of_id->data; > + > + return 0; > +} > +#else > +static inline int mxc_gpio_probe_dt(struct mxc_gpio_port *port, > + struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + return -ENODEV; > +} > +#endif > + > static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct mxc_gpio_port *port; > @@ -331,7 +367,10 @@ static int __devinit mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (!port) > return -ENOMEM; > > - port->devdata = &mxc_gpio_devdata[pdev->id_entry->driver_data]; > + err = mxc_gpio_probe_dt(port, pdev); > + if (err == -ENODEV) > + port->devdata = &mxc_gpio_devdata[pdev->id_entry->driver_data]; > + What if id_entry is NULL? > port->virtual_irq_start = MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START + pdev->id * 32; > > iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > @@ -416,6 +455,7 @@ static struct platform_driver mxc_gpio_driver = { > .driver = { > .name = "gpio-mxc", > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > + .of_match_table = mxc_gpio_dt_ids, > }, > .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, > .id_table = mxc_gpio_devtype, > -- > 1.7.4.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-06 5:21 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-07-03 8:16 [PATCH 0/2] Add device tree probe for imx/mxc gpio Shawn Guo 2011-07-03 8:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 6:10 ` Grant Likely 2011-07-04 6:11 ` Grant Likely 2011-07-04 16:56 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 16:59 ` Grant Likely 2011-07-04 6:46 ` Sascha Hauer 2011-07-04 9:28 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 9:49 ` Sascha Hauer 2011-07-04 10:20 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 16:44 ` Sascha Hauer 2011-07-05 3:01 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-05 3:04 ` Grant Likely 2011-07-05 3:32 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-05 16:42 ` Sascha Hauer 2011-07-06 5:21 ` Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 15:23 ` Grant Likely 2011-07-03 8:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio/mxc: add device tree probe support Shawn Guo 2011-07-04 6:19 ` Grant Likely
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).