From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dave.martin@linaro.org (Dave Martin)
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 17:37:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v4 00/40] ARM: mm: Add generic macros for declaring
	various CPU structs
In-Reply-To: <20110707162218.GA20403@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1310048867-14172-1-git-send-email-dave.martin@linaro.org>
	<20110707162218.GA20403@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20110707163755.GH2486@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 05:22:18PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:27:07PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > This series adds macros for declaring some CPU-related structured
> > defined in assembler, and ports the various processors, cache and
> > tlb implementations to use the macros.
> 
> I think this now looks fine - I don't have time to test it at the moment
> 600+ messages on the list yesterday (I spent most of yesterday _only_
> replying to email), new large patch sets on the list today, and
> struggling to test some of these changes...
> 
> (It's no wonder people feel that they get ignored - generally if I don't
> process things on the day they're sent, I hardly go looking back through
> my mailbox... it's only Will's pull request which made me go back and
> look at yours.)

Thanks for taking a look anyhow.

Unfortunately this series was a lot of noise, but I didn't like to
merge those patches together, due to the many orthogonal changes between
the different CPUs.

Are you happy for these patches to appear in Will's pull request now?
I'm as confident as I can reasonably be that they don't break anything,
due to the policy of not changing the resulting .o files in any material
way.  I've also tested on a couple of real platforms (though by no
means the full set).

Cheers
---Dave