From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] arm: mach-s3c2440: mini2440: fix section mismatch
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 10:12:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110708091218.GD2414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001c01cc3d35$2aa7e8f0$7ff7bad0$%kim@samsung.com>
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 03:06:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> > If mini2440_init() is in __init, mini2440_parse_features() should also
> > be in __init. Fixes:
> >
> > (.text+0x9adc): Section mismatch in reference from the function
> > mini2440_parse_features.clone.0() to the (unknown reference)
> .init.data:(unknown)
> > The function mini2440_parse_features.clone.0() references the (unknown
> reference)
> > __initdata (unknown).
>
> But I couldn't find above "Section mismatch" in my building with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y.
Your compiler may have inlined the function, so defeating the check.
static struct s3c2410fb_display mini2440_lcd_cfg[] __initdata = {
and mini2440_parse_features() references this variable. Therefore
either mini2440_parse_features() needs to be marked __init (it's
only caller is from __init, so that seems sensible) or the
__initdata markers on the referenced data need to be removed.
Adding __init looks like the right thing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-08 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-07 10:18 [PATCH 0/4] Cleanups for the mini2440 board Wolfram Sang
2011-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm: plat-s3c24xx: dma: don't use uninitialized variable Wolfram Sang
2011-07-08 5:38 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm: plat-s3c24xx: dma: drop return codes in void function Wolfram Sang
2011-07-07 19:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-08 5:37 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm: mach-s3c2440: dma: fix section mismatch Wolfram Sang
2011-07-07 10:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-07 10:33 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm: mach-s3c2440: mini2440: " Wolfram Sang
2011-07-08 6:06 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-07-08 9:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-07-08 9:25 ` Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110708091218.GD2414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).