linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Remaining omap pull requests
@ 2011-07-11 11:47 Tony Lindgren
  2011-07-11 11:53 ` [GIT PULL] omap related MFD and ASoC patches for v3.1 merge window Tony Lindgren
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2011-07-11 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi Arnd,

Below is a summary of the pending omap pull requests as there are still
few branches pending.

Can you please take a look and see what you can take of these for v3.1
merge window?

There's still quite a bit more code shrinkage, and the new code for 4460
and PRCM related changes are badly needed.

Here's what's still pending:

1. Branches to pull into omap/cleanup

   I will reply to this mail with a pull request for cleanup-part-3
   that contains Russell's timer cleanup patch and Paul's PRCM cleanup
   series.

2. Branches to pull into omap/fixes

   I will reply to this mail with a pull request for fixes-part-2 that
   contains Paul's PRCM fixes, and one McBSP fix also from Paul.

   This branch depends on cleanup-part-3 in #1 above for the PRCM fixes.

3. Branches to pull into omap/board

   This one needs one merge commit to clear the merge conflict that
   I posted on Sunday at:

   http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=131032743717583&w=2

4. New code for minimal omap4460 support

   This I've posted here:

   http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=131032754417673&w=2

   It has some a trivial merge conflict with the cleanup-part-3 in
   #1 above that you should be able to handle.

5. New code for ASoC and MFD changes

   Because of the TWL cleanup, it was agreed that the TWL related
   MFD/ASoC changes should be merged by us also. I will reply to
   this mail with a pull request for this email.

   Note that this could also be merged by the ASoC or MFD people
   if they pull in your omap/cleanup-part-2.

6. New code for PRCM changes

   This you might as well pull from Paul directly as posted here:

   http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=131030152129307&w=2

   It depends on the PRCM fixes in #2 above. I've already pulled
   this into linux-omap master branch for testing.

The following order should be kept for these branches:

omap/cleanup
omap/fixes
omap/board

And after that these can be merged in whatever order:

new code for minimal 4460 support
new code for ASoC/MFD
new code for PRCM changes

Then there are two new boards remaining, but they both are waiting
on the machine_id patch.

Regards,

Tony

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [GIT PULL] omap related MFD and ASoC patches for v3.1 merge window
  2011-07-11 11:47 Remaining omap pull requests Tony Lindgren
@ 2011-07-11 11:53 ` Tony Lindgren
  2011-07-11 22:16 ` Remaining omap pull requests Arnd Bergmann
  2011-07-12  8:41 ` Jan Weitzel
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2011-07-11 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

The following changes since commit 727e18b429e3badda12d1de74f492bfa363a2e94:
  Tony Lindgren (1):
        Merge branch 'peter/topic/for-tony_mach-cleanup' of git://gitorious.org/omap-audio/linux-audio into cleanup-part-2

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git twl-asoc

These depend on the cleanup-part-2 branch, so it was agreed with the MFD and ASoC
maintainers that they should get merged along with the other omap patches.

Axel Castaneda Gonzalez (1):
      ASoC: twl6040: Configure ramp step based on platform

Liam Girdwood (3):
      ASoC: twl6040: add all ABE DAIs
      ASoC: twl6040: Support other sample rates in constraints.
      ASoC: twl6040: set default constraints.

Misael Lopez Cruz (5):
      mfd: twl6040: Add initial support
      ASoC: twl6040: Convert into TWL6040 MFD child
      input: Add initial support for TWL6040 vibrator
      ASoC: twl6040: Remove pll and headset mode dependency
      OMAP4: SDP4430: Add twl6040 codec platform support

Peter Ujfalusi (17):
      MFD: twl4030-codec: Rename internals from codec to audio
      MFD: twl4030-codec -> twl4030-audio: Rename the driver
      MFD: twl4030-audio: Rename platform data
      MFD: twl6040: Change platform data for soc codec driver
      OMAP4: SDP4430: Add twl6040 vibrator platform support
      MFD: twl6040: Use resource to provide irq number for slaves
      input: twl6040-vibra: Do not use wrapper for irq request
      ASoC: twl6040: Do not use wrapper for irq request
      MFD: twl6040: Demand valid interrupt configuration
      MFD: twl6040: Remove wrapper for threaded irq request
      ASoC: twl6040: Use neutral name for power mode text/enum
      ASoC: twl6040: Move PLL selection to codec driver
      ASoC: twl6040: Simplify sample rate constraint handling
      ASoC: twl6040: Configure PLL only once
      MFD: twl6040: Remove enum for PLL tracking
      ASoC: twl6040: No need to convert the PLL ID
      ASoC: twl6040: Add back support for legacy mode

Tony Lindgren (1):
      Merge branch 'peter/topic/for-tony' of git://gitorious.org/omap-audio/linux-audio into twl-asoc

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c                |   56 ++
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c       |    6 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.c       |   10 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/twl-common.c                   |   10 +-
 arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/irqs.h             |   12 +-
 drivers/input/misc/Kconfig                         |   13 +-
 drivers/input/misc/Makefile                        |    1 +
 drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c                 |   12 +-
 drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c                 |  423 +++++++++++
 drivers/mfd/Kconfig                                |    8 +-
 drivers/mfd/Makefile                               |    3 +-
 drivers/mfd/twl-core.c                             |   13 +-
 drivers/mfd/twl4030-audio.c                        |  277 ++++++++
 drivers/mfd/twl4030-codec.c                        |  277 --------
 drivers/mfd/twl6040-core.c                         |  620 +++++++++++++++++
 drivers/mfd/twl6040-irq.c                          |  191 +++++
 include/linux/i2c/twl.h                            |   25 +-
 .../linux/mfd/{twl4030-codec.h => twl4030-audio.h} |   16 +-
 include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h                        |  228 ++++++
 sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig                           |    3 +-
 sound/soc/codecs/twl4030.c                         |   22 +-
 sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c                         |  733 +++++++++-----------
 sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.h                         |  119 +----
 sound/soc/omap/sdp3430.c                           |    2 +-
 sound/soc/omap/sdp4430.c                           |   52 +--
 sound/soc/omap/zoom2.c                             |    2 +-
 26 files changed, 2230 insertions(+), 904 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/twl4030-audio.c
 delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/twl4030-codec.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/twl6040-core.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/twl6040-irq.c
 rename include/linux/mfd/{twl4030-codec.h => twl4030-audio.h} (96%)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Remaining omap pull requests
  2011-07-11 11:47 Remaining omap pull requests Tony Lindgren
  2011-07-11 11:53 ` [GIT PULL] omap related MFD and ASoC patches for v3.1 merge window Tony Lindgren
@ 2011-07-11 22:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
  2011-07-13  6:16   ` Tony Lindgren
  2011-07-12  8:41 ` Jan Weitzel
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2011-07-11 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Monday 11 July 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> Below is a summary of the pending omap pull requests as there are still
> few branches pending.
> 
> Can you please take a look and see what you can take of these for v3.1
> merge window?
> 
> There's still quite a bit more code shrinkage, and the new code for 4460
> and PRCM related changes are badly needed.

I've pulled everything now, please check if it looks ok to you.

I haven't really looked at the patches much, I hope that I have time
to at least do some test builds and take a very rough look at the
contents tomorrow.

Thanks for the detailed descriptions, and for splitting it
into good-sized series.

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Remaining omap pull requests
  2011-07-11 11:47 Remaining omap pull requests Tony Lindgren
  2011-07-11 11:53 ` [GIT PULL] omap related MFD and ASoC patches for v3.1 merge window Tony Lindgren
  2011-07-11 22:16 ` Remaining omap pull requests Arnd Bergmann
@ 2011-07-12  8:41 ` Jan Weitzel
  2011-07-13  6:25   ` Tony Lindgren
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Weitzel @ 2011-07-12  8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Am Montag, den 11.07.2011, 04:47 -0700 schrieb Tony Lindgren:

> Then there are two new boards remaining, but they both are waiting
> on the machine_id patch.
> 

If one of them is our pcm049 OMAP4 board, the machine_id is already in.
pcm049                  MACH_PCM049             PCM049                  3364

Kind Regards,
Jan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Remaining omap pull requests
  2011-07-11 22:16 ` Remaining omap pull requests Arnd Bergmann
@ 2011-07-13  6:16   ` Tony Lindgren
  2011-08-02 23:14     ` Kevin Hilman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2011-07-13  6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [110711 15:11]:
> On Monday 11 July 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> > 
> > Below is a summary of the pending omap pull requests as there are still
> > few branches pending.
> > 
> > Can you please take a look and see what you can take of these for v3.1
> > merge window?
> > 
> > There's still quite a bit more code shrinkage, and the new code for 4460
> > and PRCM related changes are badly needed.
> 
> I've pulled everything now, please check if it looks ok to you.

Thanks looks good to me.
 
> I haven't really looked at the patches much, I hope that I have time
> to at least do some test builds and take a very rough look at the
> contents tomorrow.

OK thanks.
 
> Thanks for the detailed descriptions, and for splitting it
> into good-sized series.

Looks like I forgot the i2c driver changes that also should be
merged by us. Those are acked by Ben Dooks, Kevin's pull request
for that is at:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=131014213007667&w=2

Regards,

Tony

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Remaining omap pull requests
  2011-07-12  8:41 ` Jan Weitzel
@ 2011-07-13  6:25   ` Tony Lindgren
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2011-07-13  6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

* Jan Weitzel <J.Weitzel@phytec.de> [110712 01:36]:
> Am Montag, den 11.07.2011, 04:47 -0700 schrieb Tony Lindgren:
> 
> > Then there are two new boards remaining, but they both are waiting
> > on the machine_id patch.
> > 
> 
> If one of them is our pcm049 OMAP4 board, the machine_id is already in.
> pcm049                  MACH_PCM049             PCM049                  3364

Yes, thanks for pointing that out. And now we also have an ack from Russell
for the Nook mach-types changes. I'll take one more look at the machine
patches and if no issues will apply them.

Regards,

Tony

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Remaining omap pull requests
  2011-07-13  6:16   ` Tony Lindgren
@ 2011-08-02 23:14     ` Kevin Hilman
  2011-08-03  0:06       ` Kevin Hilman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2011-08-02 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi Arnd,

On 07/12/2011 11:16 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann<arnd@arndb.de>  [110711 15:11]:
>> On Monday 11 July 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> Hi Arnd,
>>>
>>> Below is a summary of the pending omap pull requests as there are still
>>> few branches pending.
>>>
>>> Can you please take a look and see what you can take of these for v3.1
>>> merge window?
>>>
>>> There's still quite a bit more code shrinkage, and the new code for 4460
>>> and PRCM related changes are badly needed.
>>
>> I've pulled everything now, please check if it looks ok to you.
>
> Thanks looks good to me.
>
>> I haven't really looked at the patches much, I hope that I have time
>> to at least do some test builds and take a very rough look at the
>> contents tomorrow.
>
> OK thanks.
>
>> Thanks for the detailed descriptions, and for splitting it
>> into good-sized series.
>
> Looks like I forgot the i2c driver changes that also should be
> merged by us. Those are acked by Ben Dooks, Kevin's pull request
> for that is at:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=131014213007667&w=2
>

I thought this was already pulled, but looking now I see that this was 
never pulled into the arm-soc tree.

Can you pull this for v3.1 please?

Kevin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Remaining omap pull requests
  2011-08-02 23:14     ` Kevin Hilman
@ 2011-08-03  0:06       ` Kevin Hilman
  2011-08-10 12:21         ` Tony Lindgren
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2011-08-03  0:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 08/02/2011 04:14 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Looks like I forgot the i2c driver changes that also should be
>> merged by us. Those are acked by Ben Dooks, Kevin's pull request
>> for that is at:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=131014213007667&w=2
>>
>
> I thought this was already pulled, but looking now I see that this was
> never pulled into the arm-soc tree.
>
> Can you pull this for v3.1 please?

Oops, I had to rebase this branch as Paul had picked up a few of these 
patches for his fixes (which are now part of arm-soc/next/fixes2.) 
Updated pull request below.

Also, I noticed there's a minor conflict with something coming from the
trivial tree[1].

Kevin

The following changes since commit 6d3c55fd4f0f94a9455d30df9414ddb0f755f402:

   OMAP: hwmod: fix the i2c-reset timeout during bootup (2011-07-10 
05:27:16 -0600)

are available in the git repository at:
 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git 
for_3.1/i2c-andy-2

Andy Green (12):
       I2C: OMAP2+: Name registers in I2C IP V2 only accordingly
       I2C: OMAP: add rev to omap i2c platform data
       I2C: OMAP1: set IP revision in platform data
       I2C: OMAP2+: Pass hwmod rev knowledge via platform_data when i2c 
bus added
       I2C: OMAP2+: use platform_data ip revision to select register map
       I2C: OMAP2+: Solve array bounds overflow error on i2c idle
       I2C: OMAP2+: address confused probed version naming
       I2C: OMAP1/OMAP2+: add flags field to omap i2c platform data
       I2C: OMAP2+: Pass flags up to omap i2c platform_data as well
       I2C: OMAP1: set i2c unit feature implementation flags in platform 
data
       I2C: OMAP2+: Convert omap I2C driver to use feature 
implementation flags from platform data
       I2C: OMAP1/OMAP2+: prepend I2C IP version to probed version shown 
in dev_info

  arch/arm/plat-omap/i2c.c      |   27 +++++++++++
  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c |  100 
++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
  include/linux/i2c-omap.h      |    2 +
  3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)


[1]
commit 32575a9183c82a5ea0f9ed1bcf13c17189ea1118
Author: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Date:   Sat Jul 9 23:20:42 2011 +0200

     drivers/i2c: static should be at beginning of declaration

     Make sure that the 'static' keywork is at the beginning of declaration
     for drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c

     This gets rid of warnings like
       warning: ?static? is not at beginning of declaration
     when building with -Wold-style-declaration (and/or -Wextra which also
     enables it).

     Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
     Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Remaining omap pull requests
  2011-08-03  0:06       ` Kevin Hilman
@ 2011-08-10 12:21         ` Tony Lindgren
  2011-08-16 14:07           ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2011-08-10 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

* Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> [110802 17:00]:
> On 08/02/2011 04:14 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> [...]
> >>
> >>Looks like I forgot the i2c driver changes that also should be
> >>merged by us. Those are acked by Ben Dooks, Kevin's pull request
> >>for that is at:
> >>
> >>http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=131014213007667&w=2
> >>
> >
> >I thought this was already pulled, but looking now I see that this was
> >never pulled into the arm-soc tree.
> >
> >Can you pull this for v3.1 please?

I'll send a pull request for Ben Dooks for this as now the conflicting
parts have been merged.
 
> Oops, I had to rebase this branch as Paul had picked up a few of
> these patches for his fixes (which are now part of
> arm-soc/next/fixes2.) Updated pull request below.
> 
> Also, I noticed there's a minor conflict with something coming from the
> trivial tree[1].

Looks like i2c-andy-2 still fails to merge cleanly on top of v3.1-rc1.
Will resolve for Ben and proxy the pull request while you're on vacation.

Regards,

Tony
 

> The following changes since commit 6d3c55fd4f0f94a9455d30df9414ddb0f755f402:
> 
>   OMAP: hwmod: fix the i2c-reset timeout during bootup (2011-07-10
> 05:27:16 -0600)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git
> for_3.1/i2c-andy-2
> 
> Andy Green (12):
>       I2C: OMAP2+: Name registers in I2C IP V2 only accordingly
>       I2C: OMAP: add rev to omap i2c platform data
>       I2C: OMAP1: set IP revision in platform data
>       I2C: OMAP2+: Pass hwmod rev knowledge via platform_data when
> i2c bus added
>       I2C: OMAP2+: use platform_data ip revision to select register map
>       I2C: OMAP2+: Solve array bounds overflow error on i2c idle
>       I2C: OMAP2+: address confused probed version naming
>       I2C: OMAP1/OMAP2+: add flags field to omap i2c platform data
>       I2C: OMAP2+: Pass flags up to omap i2c platform_data as well
>       I2C: OMAP1: set i2c unit feature implementation flags in
> platform data
>       I2C: OMAP2+: Convert omap I2C driver to use feature
> implementation flags from platform data
>       I2C: OMAP1/OMAP2+: prepend I2C IP version to probed version
> shown in dev_info
> 
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/i2c.c      |   27 +++++++++++
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c |  100
> ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  include/linux/i2c-omap.h      |    2 +
>  3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> [1]
> commit 32575a9183c82a5ea0f9ed1bcf13c17189ea1118
> Author: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
> Date:   Sat Jul 9 23:20:42 2011 +0200
> 
>     drivers/i2c: static should be at beginning of declaration
> 
>     Make sure that the 'static' keywork is at the beginning of declaration
>     for drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> 
>     This gets rid of warnings like
>       warning: ?static? is not at beginning of declaration
>     when building with -Wold-style-declaration (and/or -Wextra which also
>     enables it).
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
>     Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Remaining omap pull requests
  2011-08-10 12:21         ` Tony Lindgren
@ 2011-08-16 14:07           ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2011-08-16 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Wednesday 10 August 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> [110802 17:00]:
> > On 08/02/2011 04:14 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > [...]
> > >>
> > >>Looks like I forgot the i2c driver changes that also should be
> > >>merged by us. Those are acked by Ben Dooks, Kevin's pull request
> > >>for that is at:
> > >>
> > >>http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&amp;m=131014213007667&amp;w=2
> > >>
> > >
> > >I thought this was already pulled, but looking now I see that this was
> > >never pulled into the arm-soc tree.
> > >
> > >Can you pull this for v3.1 please?
> 
> I'll send a pull request for Ben Dooks for this as now the conflicting
> parts have been merged.

Sorry for missing this one during the merge window. I'm now starting to
collect branches for 3.2, so please tell me if you want me to pull it
now, if there is anything left that is not yet in Ben's tree.

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-16 14:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-11 11:47 Remaining omap pull requests Tony Lindgren
2011-07-11 11:53 ` [GIT PULL] omap related MFD and ASoC patches for v3.1 merge window Tony Lindgren
2011-07-11 22:16 ` Remaining omap pull requests Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-13  6:16   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-08-02 23:14     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-03  0:06       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-10 12:21         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-08-16 14:07           ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-12  8:41 ` Jan Weitzel
2011-07-13  6:25   ` Tony Lindgren

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).