From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:18:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] new helper to define common struct resource constructs In-Reply-To: <201107121529.17611.arnd@arndb.de> References: <14C4E31473AF7E4B98176CB73615181C19FBD3@039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net> <201107072304.05626.arnd@arndb.de> <201107121529.17611.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <20110713141849.b8cbf675.akpm@linux-foundation.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:29:17 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 11 July 2011, Uwe Kleine-K__nig wrote: > > resource definitions that just define start, end and flags = IORESOURCE_MEM > > or IORESOURCE_IRQ (with start=end) are quite common. So introduce a shortcut > > for them. Also make available a macro to specify named resources of both > > types which are less common. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K____nig > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > What do others think, is this worthwhile? > Should we also define macros for IORESOURCE_IO and IORESOURCE_DMA? > It would help if we could see some usage examples (ie: sample conversions), to get a better idea of the value of this. Also, DEFINE_RES_NAMED() is going to need a bunch of argument parentheses to make it bulletproof.