From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:56:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/7] at91: remove non used at91_spi.h In-Reply-To: <20110716105752.GD20678@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <1310687525-22486-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <1310687525-22486-4-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <4E2028E1.1060603@vollmann.ch> <20110715154636.GA20678@game.jcrosoft.org> <4E206E7D.2070708@vollmann.ch> <20110716105752.GD20678@game.jcrosoft.org> Message-ID: <20110716115655.GA1992@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > About the SPI driver: > > From Documentation/spi/spi-summary: > > "At this writing, Linux has no slave side programming interface." > > So there's no SPI framwork that covers the slave side. > This what I mean use the SPI framework and add the SPI Slave support there [CCing spi-devel] If you talk about SPI slaves, be sure to have read Grant's comments in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.spi.devel/7401 to see what would be needed for slave support. Short note: Would be seperate subsystem, master subsystem is of limited use. I think a few slave-drivers would be nice to evaluate, so one can get a feeling if a subsystem makes sense and if so, how it could look like. Detlef, have you posted your slave driver so far? Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: