From: ivan.djelic@parrot.com (Ivan Djelic)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [i.MX28 GPMI] problem overwriting all-0xff data in NAND
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:56:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110718145635.GA24419@parrot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20004.12663.29494.339601@ipc1.ka-ro>
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:13:27PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with the gpmi-nfc driver for imx28 from Shawn Guo on a TX28 I
> encountered some problems with jffs2 when overwriting pages that have
> been written with 0xff (e.g. from padding from the file system image
> file).
>
> The problem is that the ECC info for an all-0xff block is not all-0xff
> and thus a newly erased block is different from a block that has been
> written with 0xff.
> If such a block is being altered (jffs2 thinking it can simply
> overwrite it without erasing first) the ECC information will be
> corrupted and will produce ECC errors upon read.
Hello Lothar,
Can you describe more precisely what is happening ? How did you come to the
conclusion that JFFS2 "thinks it can simply overwrite a block without erasing it
first" ?
JFFS2 normally marks a block as clean just after it has erased it; it won't
blindly assume a block is erased and write to it.
I am not very familiar with how JFFS2 metadata work, but I doubt it would
confuse a blank page with a page containing a piece of file with 0xff bytes.
Are you sure your gpmi-nfc driver is not writing ECC info when JFFS2 writes its
cleanmarker, like in the issue previously discussed in
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-June/036538.html ?
BR,
Ivan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-18 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-18 13:13 [i.MX28 GPMI] problem overwriting all-0xff data in NAND Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-18 14:56 ` Ivan Djelic [this message]
2011-07-19 5:59 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-19 6:48 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-07-18 16:43 ` Shawn Guo
2011-07-19 2:12 ` Huang Shijie
2011-07-19 6:02 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-19 7:03 ` Huang Shijie
2011-07-19 9:55 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-19 13:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-07-20 2:18 ` Huang Shijie
2011-07-20 8:51 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-07-20 4:55 ` Huang Shijie
2011-07-20 6:22 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-20 5:16 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-07-20 5:19 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-07-19 6:00 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-20 6:44 ` Huang Shijie
2011-07-20 8:10 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-20 8:35 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-07-20 5:12 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110718145635.GA24419@parrot.com \
--to=ivan.djelic@parrot.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox