public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [i.MX28 GPMI] problem overwriting all-0xff data in NAND
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:51:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110720085142.GA2377@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E263AF2.60103@freescale.com>


> >>>>>I am debugging the DMA bug now. and I will send it out when i fix it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>What sort of DMA bug?
> >>>>
> >>>The DMA may time-out. :(
> >>>
> >>>The DMA time-out may occur in two situations:
> >>>[1] send a command DMA descriptor, see the nfc->send_command() function.
> >>>[2] read the non-ecc data from nand, see the nfc->read_data() function.
> >>>
> >>>I don't know why. Maybe caused by the timing, or something else.
> >I am confused. The send-command DMA timeout prevents any write for me.
> >You guys surely would have noticed if you have been bitten as well. Does
> >it depend on the NAND chip?
> I think It does not depend on the NAND chip.
> My test chip is Samsung K9G8G08U0M.
> Sometimes, I can run a long time while there is no DMA timeout occurring;
> Sometimes, the bug appears right away.

For me, the bug always happens right away. So, if you need logs or debug
output or can give me a pointer into some direction, I am glad to
assist.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20110720/6ee8c27d/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-20  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-18 13:13 [i.MX28 GPMI] problem overwriting all-0xff data in NAND Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-18 14:56 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-07-19  5:59   ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-19  6:48     ` Ivan Djelic
2011-07-18 16:43 ` Shawn Guo
2011-07-19  2:12   ` Huang Shijie
2011-07-19  6:02     ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-19  7:03       ` Huang Shijie
2011-07-19  9:55         ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-19 13:36           ` Wolfram Sang
2011-07-20  2:18             ` Huang Shijie
2011-07-20  8:51               ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2011-07-20  4:55           ` Huang Shijie
2011-07-20  6:22             ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-20  5:16     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-07-20  5:19       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-07-19  6:00   ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-20  6:44   ` Huang Shijie
2011-07-20  8:10     ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-20  8:35     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-07-20  5:12 ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110720085142.GA2377@pengutronix.de \
    --to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox