From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:39:33 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] dt: omap3: add generic board file for dt support In-Reply-To: <4E27F264.4040409@ti.com> References: <1310592975-25773-4-git-send-email-manjugk@ti.com> <20110718090710.GZ5783@atomide.com> <20110719213458.GO6848@ponder.secretlab.ca> <4E27E967.7090501@ti.com> <20110721090918.GI23253@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <4E27F264.4040409@ti.com> Message-ID: <20110721093932.GN23253@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:03:24PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >IMHO, all omap_hwmod_*_data.c files become pretty much useless if we > >move completely to DT. All hwmod data is passing today, can be passed > >via DT and in a similar Hierarchical manner. > > Would the data representation be equally readable? > That's one of the problems I faced when I started > looking at it initially trying to move a lot of these > structures. not to my eyes, heh. I'm too used to C, though. -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: