From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:41:52 +0100
Subject: [GIT PULL] MSM fix
In-Reply-To: <201107211649.39902.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <20110720203703.GA4495@huya.qualcomm.com>
	<20110720225010.GA18381@huya.qualcomm.com>
	<20110720225406.GB20310@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<201107211649.39902.arnd@arndb.de>
Message-ID: <20110721154152.GP26574@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:49:39PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 21 July 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > It looks like it would apply to 2.6.38 and 39 as well.  I'm not sure
> > > it qualifies under the "It must fix a real bug that bothers people".
> > > It would only apply if someone had set NR_CPUS to more than 2.
> > 
> > Err, this makes no sense.  MSM doesn't have a get_core_count function
> > and as far as I can see never has done in mainline.
> 
> I've committed the version below now, with a clarified title.
> The patch looks reasonable to me, but there may be some issue
> I'm missing of course. The other platforms that used to have
> a get_core_count function no longer have that because you changed
> them to use scu_get_core_count, but that doesn't seem to apply
> to mach-msm.

That patch description helps a lot to clarify what's going on.