linux-next regression on ARM926

[linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)]

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:39:06PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Did you miss proc-v6, or is that touched by some other patch?  I
> already have the relevant patch, so I'm happy to post that if you
> don't already have it.

Well spotted, I've just corrected that.

> My proc-maros.S patch is slightly different in that it avoids defining
> the default values twice (i.e., once for !CONFIG_PM_SUSPEND and once
> for suspend=0); but it's otherwise equivalent.
> 
> I also took the opportunity to remove the definitions of
> cpu_<name>_suspend_size for the !CONFIG_PM_SUSPEND case, since this
> helps to ensure they are not used accidentally.  That's a more
> cosmetic change.

The missing symbols for do_suspend/do_resume should be enough on their
own to catch people using it, so I don't think that's necessary.

> Do you want me to post my whole series anyway, or otherwise can you
> point me to where you applied the patches so I can filter my series?

I'll push it out later this evening, it'll be part of the devel-stable
branch so once pushed it becomes immutable.