From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dave.martin@linaro.org (Dave Martin) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:18:46 +0100 Subject: linux-next regression on ARM926 In-Reply-To: References: <20110718112757.GV23270@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110719110904.GJ26574@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110721134804.GO26574@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110721165210.GD20310@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20110722081846.GA2111@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 06:00:05PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:39:06PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote: > >> Did you miss proc-v6, or is that touched by some other patch? ?I > >> already have the relevant patch, so I'm happy to post that if you > >> don't already have it. > > > > Well spotted, I've just corrected that. > > I think that should be all of them -- I had hacked up a quick script > to find and change all instances, but proc-v6 was the only one it > touched which wasn't in your series. I didn't mention, but you can add my ack to the patch for proc-v6 as well (though you probably did already, which is fine.) Cheers ---Dave