From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:52:52 +0300 Subject: [RFC/PATCH 2/7] OMAP3: beagle: don't touch omap_device internals In-Reply-To: References: <1311292338-11830-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> <1311292338-11830-4-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> <20110722085716.GI32058@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <20110728055346.GA11921@foobar> <4E315C9F.1030801@ti.com> <20110729134932.GA2258@foobar> <20110729140515.GV31013@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Message-ID: <20110801085251.GF31013@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:05, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > >> +} > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(omap_hwmod_name_get_odev); > > > > maybe EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() ?? Not sure we want non-GPL code to access > > this ;-) > > Sure.. but is this the way we want to go? if yes, I can post the > series in a formal way to the list. I would expect so, but if there are concerns of other non-GPL drivers needing this, you can at least use: EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE(); this would allow you to catch non-GPL drivers accessing this symbol. -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: