From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 00:48:16 +0900
Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ASoC: core: cache index fix
In-Reply-To: <s5haabsnfg2.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
References: <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F410B@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net>
	<20110802083850.GB9553@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F427D@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net>
	<s5hy5zcnlu8.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F43AA@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net>
	<s5hoc08nk7t.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F443D@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net>
	<s5hlivcnhe2.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F45A8@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net>
	<s5haabsnfg2.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Message-ID: <20110802154815.GE25884@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 02:52:29PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:

> Mark, Liam, could you guys take a deeper look and clean these messes
> up?

Like I've indicated several times now we should just get rid of the code
or hide it from the rest of the subsystem, it's being too cute for
vanishingly little value.  The register maps for these devices are
usually at most 255 registers so the memory savings are really not
meaningful.  I'm hoping the guys working with this device will find time
to look at fixing things, but if not I'd imagine we'll get to it at some
point in the release cycle.