From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:23:35 +0900 Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ASoC: core: cache index fix In-Reply-To: References: <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F43AA@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F443D@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F45A8@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> <20110802154815.GE25884@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110802164005.GI25884@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <20110803052333.GA16141@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:06:23PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > example. So, alternatively, we can put the condition in some generic > filter function like readable/writeble things. Yes, I suggested that already, these are just unreadable and unwritable registers :/