linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] ARM: dma_map|unmap_sg plus iommu
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 16:29:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110808152952.GA19367@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB-zwWj-VCWQ6h8wjv7owG7n7p59Ep4qXiQY3LruT64sikuSKg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 10:21:46AM -0500, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 7:57 PM, KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@samsung.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Marek Szyprowski
> ...
> >> Right now I have no idea how to handle this better. Perhaps with should be
> >> possible
> >> to specify somehow the target dma_address when doing memory allocation, but I'm
> >> not
> >> really convinced yet if this is really required.
> >>
> > What about using 'dma_handle' argument of alloc_coherent callback of
> > dma_map_ops?
> > Although it is an output argument, I think we can convey a hint or
> > start address to map
> > to the IO memory manager that resides behind dma API.
> 
> I also thought on this one, even dma_map_single receives a void *ptr
> which could be casted into a struct with both physical and virtual
> addresses to be mapped, but IMHO, this starts to add twists into the
> dma map parameters which might create confusion.

No - don't even consider that.  That's highly non-standard usage and
it'll break all existing drivers to do so.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-08 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-28 21:09 [RFC] ARM: dma_map|unmap_sg plus iommu Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-07-29  7:50 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-07-29  9:35   ` 'Joerg Roedel'
2011-07-29 10:14     ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-07-29 10:54       ` 'Joerg Roedel'
2011-07-29 14:24         ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-01  0:57           ` KyongHo Cho
2011-08-08 15:21             ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-08-08 15:29               ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-08-09  7:04               ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-08 15:04   ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-08-09  6:51     ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-13 14:39       ` Ramirez Luna, Omar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110808152952.GA19367@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).