From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:52:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] ARM: perf: updates for 3.2
In-Reply-To: <CAORVsuXPiCknwi-f1PqUuSzsPz+WSW+bRN1bt28-tpswx0L2oA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1312823771-9952-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
	<20110809093505.GD3210@pulham.picochip.com>
	<20110809094234.GA3242@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
	<20110809095434.GE3210@pulham.picochip.com>
	<20110809100123.GB3242@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
	<CAORVsuXPiCknwi-f1PqUuSzsPz+WSW+bRN1bt28-tpswx0L2oA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110809105200.GC3242@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 11:14:11AM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Hi Will,

Hello,

> I had a review of the patches and they all look all good to me.
> Although [06/10] is not easy to look at it seems correct and indeed
> the resulting code is easier to read.
> Not tested though, sorry ;(

Thanks for having a look. If you do get a chance to test, please let me know
how you get on.

> Feel free to add:
> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>

Will do, cheers.

Will