From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dave.martin@linaro.org (Dave Martin) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:20:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: entry: Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for multi-CPU kernels In-Reply-To: References: <1313504053-27873-1-git-send-email-dave.martin@linaro.org> <1313504053-27873-4-git-send-email-dave.martin@linaro.org> <1313506300.2235.13.camel@computer2> Message-ID: <20110816162044.GC1993@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:14:01PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Dave Martin wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Tixy wrote: > > > > > >> On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:14 +0100, Dave Martin wrote: > > >> [...] > > >> > +#ifdef NEED_CPU_ARCHITECTURE > > >> > + ? .align ?2 > > >> > +.LCcpu_architecture: > > >> > + ? .word ? __cpu_architecture > > >> > +#endif > > >> > > >> What's the convention about the prefix '.LC' as opposed to just '.L'? > > > > > > The .Lfoo format is more widely used than .LCfoo in the tree. > > > > ...but .LCfoo is more widely used in entry-armv.S, for exactly the > > same kind of thing. > > Just use the same style then. OK, done. Cheers ---Dave