From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 22:26:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] S3C2443: Move i2s clock definitions to common code
In-Reply-To: <201108211925.05300.heiko@sntech.de>
References: <201108201757.56483.heiko@sntech.de>
	<20110821171332.GF28546@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<201108211925.05300.heiko@sntech.de>
Message-ID: <201108212226.16669.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sunday, August 21, 2011 07:25:04 PM Heiko St?bner wrote:
> Am Sonntag 21 August 2011, 19:13:32 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
> > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 06:01:29PM +0200, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> > > +/* i2s-ref
> > > + *
> > > + * i2s bus reference clock, selectable from external, esysclk or
> > > epllref + *
> > > + * Note, this used to be two clocks, but was compressed into one.
> > > +*/
> > > +
> > > +struct clk *clk_i2s_srclist[] = {
> > > +	[0] = &clk_i2s_eplldiv.clk,
> > > +	[1] = &clk_i2s_ext,
> > > +	[2] = &clk_epllref.clk,
> > > +	[3] = &clk_epllref.clk,
> > > +};
> > 
> > Is there any reason not to make this static (have you run your patch
> > through checkpatch.pl ?)
> 
> Yep I did run all of them through checkpatch (after beeing scolded last
> time) and it didn't report anything.
> 
> But for this move of code I simply grabbed the code fragments and put them
> into their new location (i.e. it was this way in mach-s3c2443/clock.c) and
> should have probably taken a closer look at what I'm moving.
> 
> So it seems you are right, it should probably be static as everything else
> is also static.

And you don't really understand why everything else is static, right ? ;-)

(don't take it as an offense)
> 
> Heiko
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel