From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:01:19 +0100 Subject: 46dcfc8 (ARM: Update mach-types) removes used machine types In-Reply-To: <20110822125653.GB2287@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110822081000.GA16557@pengutronix.de> <201108221318.25140.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <20110822124930.GA2287@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201108221454.55723.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <20110822125653.GB2287@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20110822130119.GC2287@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:56:53PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:54:55PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Monday, August 22, 2011 02:49:30 PM Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:18:25PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > On Monday, August 22, 2011 10:33:29 AM Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:17:49AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:10:00AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Russell, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your commit 46dcfc8 that is in today's next among other changes > > > > > > > does: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -eukrea_cpuimx25sd MACH_EUKREA_CPUIMX25 EUKREA_CPUIMX25 > > > > > > > 2820 -eukrea_cpuimx35sd MACH_EUKREA_CPUIMX35 > > > > > > > EUKREA_CPUIMX35 2821 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > These two are both marked as "mainlined" on > > > > > > > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/ and both are > > > > > > > actually used > > > > > > > (arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-{eukrea_cpuimx25,cpuimx35.c}) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please add them back? Maybe it's worth to double-check the > > > > > > > other deletions?! > > > > > > > > > > > > No. They're removed because they're broken (look at them) - I've > > > > > > added additional checks so I don't have to waste _significant_ time > > > > > > fixing the entries time and time again. > > > > > > > > > > > > The requirement is that the machine_is_xxx() must match the MACH_xxx > > > > > > parts. If they don't, they will not exist in future updates. > > > > > > > > > > Ah, I wasn't aware of that requirement. > > > > > > > > > > Eric, these machine types are owned by you. Do you care to follow up? > > > > > > > > Hi Russell, > > > > > > > > maybe it'd be worth at least pinging the people before you kill off the > > > > machine so they can come up with fix? > > > > > > I've no idea which get killed off, sorry. > > > > This EUKREA thing from what I understood was removed from the machine database > > and broke things. > > So? The entry was broken. The entry was changed after submission. There > was no communication with me to fix things up. Therefore I _do_ _not_ > _care_ about it. For further reading, see: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20110815.085325.ae6ee07d.en.html