From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:43:31 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] OMAP3: board-dt: Add generic board file for DT support
In-Reply-To: <4E609800.9090402@ti.com>
References: <1314897912-18178-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com>
	<1314897912-18178-7-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com>
	<20110902080944.GP3548@atomide.com> <4E609800.9090402@ti.com>
Message-ID: <20110902104330.GR3548@atomide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

* Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@ti.com> [110902 11:13]:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 9/2/2011 10:09 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >* Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>  [110901 19:52]:
> >>Create an OMAP3 generic board to start the DT migration.
> >
> >I don't think this needs to be SoC specific, we can add multiple
> >DT_MACHINE_START entries into a single file. So it should be
> >just board-omap-dt.c.
> 
> I do agree, it should not, I made that comment into the
> board-omap4-dt.c, but for the moment we still have dedicated OMAP
> specifics stuff at board level, like the map_io.

Well map_io can also be set in DT_MACHINE_START. For most part
it already is generic like omap3_map_io and omap4_map_io.
So that should not stop anything.
 
> I have an other series that make the map_io DT aware to get rid of
> that, but it still not finalized.

Hmm maybe take a look again? We've already sorted out quite a bit
of the init stuff over past few merge windows. If there's still
something blocking that, let's clear it out ASAP.
 
> My goal was have a single DT_MACHINE_START for every OMAPs.
> But, meanwhile, if you prefer one file with many board descriptors,
> that's fine.

Yes that's better. We should only need a separate DT_MACHINE_START
for major SoC variants.

Regards,

Tony