From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:07:07 -0700 Subject: [RFC PATCH 04/10] arm/dts: OMAP4: Add mpu, dsp and iva nodes In-Reply-To: <1314191356-10963-5-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> References: <1314191356-10963-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> <1314191356-10963-5-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> Message-ID: <20110908180707.GD2967@ponder.secretlab.ca> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:09:10PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote: > Add nodes for devices used by PM code (mpu, dsp, iva). > > Add an empty cpus node as well as recommended in the DT spec. > > Remove mpu, dsp, iva devices init if CONFIG_OF is defined. > Ideally the whole function should be removed. It will be doable as > soon as the OMAP3 DT support will be added. > > Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson > Cc: Grant Likely > Cc: Kevin Hilman > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c | 5 ++++- > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi > index 928a74c..a3efe76 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi > @@ -25,11 +25,39 @@ > }; > > /* > + * XXX: The cpus node is mandatory, but since the CPUs are as well part > + * of the mpu subsystem below, it is not clear where the information > + * should be. Maybe here with a phandle inside the mpu? > + */ > + cpus { > + }; > + > + /* > * The soc node represents the soc top level view. It is uses for IPs > * that are not memory mapped in the MPU view or for the MPU itself. > */ > soc { > compatible = "ti,omap-infra"; > + mpu { > + compatible = "ti,omap4-mpu"; > + hwmods = "mpu"; > + cpu at 0 { > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9"; > + }; > + cpu at 1 { > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9"; > + }; > + }; > + > + dsp { > + compatible = "ti,omap4-c64", "ti,c64"; > + hwmods = "dsp"; > + }; > + > + iva { > + compatible = "ti,ivahd", "ti,iva"; > + hwmods = "iva"; > + }; > }; > > /* > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c > index 832577a..ba4d187 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c > @@ -49,15 +49,18 @@ static int _init_omap_device(char *name) > */ > static void omap2_init_processor_devices(void) > { > - _init_omap_device("mpu"); > if (omap3_has_iva()) > _init_omap_device("iva"); > > if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) { > +#ifndef CONFIG_OF > + _init_omap_device("mpu"); > _init_omap_device("l3_main_1"); > _init_omap_device("dsp"); > _init_omap_device("iva"); > +#endif Ditto here, turning on CONFIG_OF should not be an either/or option with ATAGs support. > } else { > + _init_omap_device("mpu"); > _init_omap_device("l3_main"); > } > } > -- > 1.7.0.4 >