linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/10] ARM: kprobes: Add some benchmarking to test module
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:41:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110912074155.GA7007@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315811353.2255.35.camel@computer2>

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 08:09:13AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
> However, looking at the current implementations of sched_clock() they
> seems to have full 64-bit range, and git history shows a new common
> infrastructure for sched_clock being added at the end of last year. So
> is the full 64-bit range now defined for the sched_clock on API on ARM?

Yes - the scheduler requires the full 64-bit range from sched_clock()
so all implementations we had needed to be fixed.  Anything which doesn't
give the full 64-bit range is now considered buggy.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-12  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-10 11:04 [PATCH v2 00/10] ARM: kprobes: Add test code to kernel tree Tixy
2011-09-10 11:04 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] ARM: kprobes: Add config option for selecting the ARM kprobes tests Tixy
2011-09-10 11:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] ARM: kprobes: Add basic API tests Tixy
2011-09-10 11:04 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] ARM: kprobes: Framework for instruction set test cases Tixy
2011-09-12  3:01   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-10 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] ARM: kprobes: Add Thumb instruction simulation " Tixy
2011-09-10 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] ARM: kprobes: Add ARM " Tixy
2011-09-10 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] ARM: kprobes: Add exports for test code Tixy
2011-09-10 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] ARM: kprobes: Add decoding table self-consistency tests Tixy
2011-09-10 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] ARM: kprobes: Add decoding table test coverage analysis Tixy
2011-09-10 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] ARM: kprobes: Add some benchmarking to test module Tixy
2011-09-12  2:58   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-12  7:09     ` Tixy
2011-09-12  7:41       ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-09-18 11:17     ` [PATCH v3] " Tixy
2011-09-10 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] ARM: kprobes: Add introductory comment to test code Tixy
2011-09-12  3:10 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] ARM: kprobes: Add test code to kernel tree Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110912074155.GA7007@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).