linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dave.martin@linaro.org (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: zImage: Allow the appending of a device tree binary
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:10:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110914161020.GH2104@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1109141056150.20358@xanadu.home>

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:10:44AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:04:28AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Sep 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > 

[...]

> > > > Do we worry that garbage in memory after the zImage might match this
> > > > magic number?
> > > > 
> > > > For example, if an ordinary userspace program allocates a huge number
> > > > of pages and fills them with bogus device tree headers, is there a chance
> > > > that the those headers could remain in memory across a reboot?
> > > 
> > > In theory this _could_ be possible.  However I don't expect this feature 
> > > to be enabled if you are not going to actually use it, especially in a 
> > > production setup.  If you are not appending a DTB to your kernel then 
> > > there is simply no point keeping this config option set (normally you 
> > > should use this option only because you have no other choices).
> > 
> > That seems reasonable.
> > 
> > Should we document this recommendation, in the Kconfig help or
> > Documentation/?
> 
> I'll add some scary wording to the help text, and make it depend on 
> EXPERIMENTAL as well.  I prefer not to impose some expectations on the 
> zImage layout for this even if not in use, like being stuck with an 
> offset that we'll always have to guard against corruption due to people 
> blindly scripting the zImage poking you suggested even when it is not 
> needed.
> 
> People will find ways to screw it up if they really want to anyway.  So 
> I'd lean towards keeping this simple and not create any legacy around 
> this hopefully temporary accommodation feature.

Yeah, sure -- I think documentating it is enough for now.

And I agree we don't really want to reinvent the rdev nastiness for zImages...

Cheers
---Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-14 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-14  5:41 [PATCH 0/6] zImage improvements with DTB append and ATAG compatibility Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-14  5:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: zImage: ensure it is always a multiple of 64 bits in size Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-14  5:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: zImage: Allow the appending of a device tree binary Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-14 13:32   ` Dave Martin
2011-09-14 14:04     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-14 14:20       ` Dave Martin
2011-09-14 15:10         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-14 16:10           ` Dave Martin [this message]
2011-09-14  5:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: zImage: make sure appended DTB doesn't get overwritten by kernel .bss Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-14  5:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: zImage: gather some string functions into string.c Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-14 13:13   ` Dave Martin
2011-09-14 13:45     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-14 14:23       ` Dave Martin
2011-09-14 14:43         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-14  5:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: zImage: allow supplementing appended DTB with traditional ATAG data Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-14  5:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: zImage: prevent constant copy+rebuild of lib1funcs.S Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-16  3:58   ` Stephen Boyd
2011-09-16  4:48     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-16  7:15     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-16 17:20       ` Stephen Boyd
2011-09-14  8:54 ` [PATCH 0/6] zImage improvements with DTB append and ATAG compatibility Shawn Guo
2011-09-14 13:19 ` Dave Martin
2011-09-14 15:26 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-09-14 22:56 ` David Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110914161020.GH2104@arm.com \
    --to=dave.martin@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).