From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:33:37 +0100
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/11] regulator: Fix error check in
	set_consumer_device_supply
In-Reply-To: <1316085727-15023-3-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com>
References: <1316085727-15023-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com>
	<1316085727-15023-2-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com>
	<1316085727-15023-3-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com>
Message-ID: <20110915133337.GI7988@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:51:58PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> The parameters to set_consumer_device_supply() can be considered
> invalid (and hence it could return -EINVAL) if nether consumer_dev nor
> consumer_dev_name are passed, not when *both* are passed.

> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>

No, passing both is a clear bug on the part of the caller - the two ways
of specifying the device are not supposed to be used together.