From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:50:22 +0200 Subject: READ THIS: the next mach-types update In-Reply-To: <20110915102528.GI6267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110915102528.GI6267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20110915145022.GM28104@game.jcrosoft.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11:25 Thu 15 Sep , Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > I'm going to be merging a mach-types update (the cut-down and the > policy-conforming version) for the next merge window. This will mean > that things WILL BREAK, and I will not notice that things have broken. > > In order to fix this, entries need to be fixed to conform to the > requirements - where the machine_is_xxx() name is the same as the > MACH_TYPE_xxx name and the CONFIG_MACH_xxx name too. > > Moreover, entries older than 12 months which have not been merged will > be removed. It is not possible to automatically check for machine_is_xxx() > usages as these could conflict with other architectures, and I'm > certainly NOT checking for them by hand (I estimate that'd take a > significant amount of manual effort to do.) What that means is that it > is _important_ to get the core platform support in _first_ before any > drivers which may make use of this. > > The following will be deleted from the file this time around are: > -ts_x09 MACH_TS209 TS209 1565 > -at572d940hfek MACH_AT572D940HFEB AT572D940HFEB 1783 can be dropped the at572d940hfek as the at572d940hf is drop from mainline Russell an you confirm you will re-add the usb-a9g20 and the folowing one usb_a9g20 MACH_USB_A9G20 USB_A9G20 1841 qil_a9g20 MACH_QIL_A9G20 QIL_A9G20 1844 tny_a9260 MACH_TNY_A9260 TNY_A9260 2058 tny_a9g20 MACH_TNY_A9G20 TNY_A9G20 2059 tny_a9263 MACH_TNY_A9263 TNY_A9263 2140 I'm working on there port mainline I add the usb_a9g20 recently and will continue in the following weeks Best Regards, J.