From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] arm/imx6q: add core definitions and low-level debug uart
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:59:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110917115941.GF16381@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110912141440.GC7007@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:14:41PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:44:39AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > I vote to skip params_phys and initrd_phys now. Every recent bootloader
> > does not need them. As the i.MX6 is a new SoC, we have no reason to
> > handle legacy bootloaders.
>
> Can we stop this misunderstanding right now.
>
> It's NOT about legacy boot loaders. It's about the bootp code which
> allows an initrd to be packaged up together with a zImage file as one
> single file.
>
> That's used to be able to boot with an initrd on platforms which can
> only obtain one file from the boot media, and they specify where the
> parameters are expected to be (which can be solved by updating the
> code to use r2) and where to place the initrd image (which can't be
> solved as it would mean encoding memory information for every platform
> into the bootp code.)
>
> An example of a current boot loader which requires this: Simtec's Able
> boot loader.
Here's a patch to reduce the reliance of arch/arm/boot/bootp on having
a correct initrd image location passed from the platform Makefile.boot.
It doesn't get rid of it, as it's required if the platform does not
pass a valid value in r2 to the kernel.
Note - I have a new code for a platform (of the nommu variety) which
requires this to be able to boot. Also note that we're probably going
to have to find a way to make this work with DT too (if not then I may
be submitting this platform without DT any support.)
---
arch/arm/boot/bootp/init.S | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/bootp/init.S b/arch/arm/boot/bootp/init.S
index 78b5080..d1cb5a9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/bootp/init.S
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/bootp/init.S
@@ -16,6 +16,14 @@
* size immediately following the kernel, we could build this into
* a binary blob, and concatenate the zImage using the cat command.
*/
+
+#define ATAG_CORE 0x54410001
+#define ATAG_CORE_SIZE ((2*4 + 3*4) >> 2)
+#define ATAG_CORE_SIZE_EMPTY ((2*4) >> 2)
+
+#define ATAG_INITRD2 0x54420005
+#define ATAG_INITRD2_SIZE ((4*4) >> 2)
+
.section .start,#alloc,#execinstr
.type _start, #function
.globl _start
@@ -37,13 +45,31 @@ _start: add lr, pc, #-0x8 @ lr = current load addr
@ r8 = initrd end
@ r9 = param_struct address
+/*
+ * Check whether we were given a valid ATAG list from the boot loader.
+ * If it looks like a valid pointer, then use that rather than the
+ * hard-coded value.
+ */
+ tst r2, #3 @ aligned
+ bne 1f
+ ldr r10, [r2, #0] @ get first tag size
+ teq r10, #ATAG_CORE_SIZE
+ teqne r10, #ATAG_CORE_SIZE_EMPTY
+ bne 1f
+ ldr r10, [r2, #4] @ get first tag type
+ teq r10, r5 @ is it ATAG_CORE?
+ bne 1f
+ mov r9, r2
+ b taglist
+
+1: mov r2, r9 @ params for the kernel
ldr r10, [r9, #4] @ get first tag
teq r10, r5 @ is it ATAG_CORE?
/*
* If we didn't find a valid tag list, create a dummy ATAG_CORE entry.
*/
movne r10, #0 @ terminator
- movne r4, #2 @ Size of this entry (2 words)
+ movne r4, #ATAG_CORE_SIZE_EMPTY @ Size of this entry (2 words)
stmneia r9, {r4, r5, r10} @ Size, ATAG_CORE, terminator
/*
@@ -56,7 +82,7 @@ taglist: ldr r10, [r9, #0] @ tag length
addne r9, r9, r10, lsl #2
bne taglist
- mov r5, #4 @ Size of initrd tag (4 words)
+ mov r5, #ATAG_INITRD2_SIZE @ Size of initrd tag (4 words)
stmia r9, {r5, r6, r7, r8, r10}
b kernel_start @ call kernel
@@ -80,8 +106,8 @@ data: .word initrd_start @ source initrd address
.word initrd_phys @ destination initrd address
.word initrd_size @ initrd size
- .word 0x54410001 @ r5 = ATAG_CORE
- .word 0x54420005 @ r6 = ATAG_INITRD2
+ .word ATAG_CORE @ r5
+ .word ATAG_INITRD2 @ r6
.word initrd_phys @ r7
.word initrd_size @ r8
.word params_phys @ r9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-17 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-06 9:58 [PATCH 0/6] add initial imx6q support Shawn Guo
2011-09-06 9:58 ` [PATCH 1/6] arm/imx6q: add device tree source Shawn Guo
2011-09-06 18:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-07 11:16 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-06 9:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] arm/imx6q: add core definitions and low-level debug uart Shawn Guo
2011-09-06 18:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-07 8:50 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-06 20:25 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-07 11:00 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-07 12:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-07 14:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-07 15:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-08 14:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-09 17:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-12 2:30 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-12 7:41 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-12 8:43 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-12 8:44 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-09-12 11:36 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-12 14:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-17 11:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-09-15 1:24 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-06 9:58 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm/imx6q: add core drivers clock, gpc, mmdc and src Shawn Guo
2011-09-06 19:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-07 6:05 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-07 7:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-12 16:12 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-12 19:40 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-12 20:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-12 21:04 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-13 0:07 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-07 12:43 ` Barry Song
2011-09-08 6:48 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-11 2:28 ` Barry Song
2011-09-12 19:16 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-12 9:46 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-09-12 11:49 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-12 12:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-12 12:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-12 14:27 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-15 1:26 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-06 9:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm/imx6q: add smp and cpu hotplug support Shawn Guo
2011-09-06 18:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-07 4:41 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-07 5:08 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-07 7:46 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-06 9:58 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm/imx6q: add device tree machine support Shawn Guo
2011-09-06 18:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-07 3:07 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-07 7:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-06 9:58 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm/imx6q: add suspend/resume support Shawn Guo
2011-09-06 18:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-07 13:50 ` Barry Song
2011-09-08 6:23 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-08 7:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-08 15:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-08 16:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-08 17:09 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2011-09-09 7:40 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 6:31 ` Barry Song
2011-09-09 7:32 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 8:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-09 10:15 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 18:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-06 18:28 ` [PATCH 0/6] add initial imx6q support Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-06 19:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-07 2:55 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-07 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-07 2:51 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110917115941.GF16381@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).